137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35593601)
1. Comparison of long-term results of obliterative colpocleisis and reconstructive vaginal surgery including sacrospinous ligament fixation in patients with total genital prolapse.
Agacayak E; Bulut M; Peker N; Gunduz R; Tunc SY; Evsen MS; Gul T
Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 May; 25(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 35593601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of life following vaginal reconstructive versus obliterative surgery for treating advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
Petcharopas A; Wongtra-Ngan S; Chinthakanan O
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 29379997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for recurrence after Le Fort colpocleisis for severe pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women.
Krissi H; Aviram A; Eitan R; From A; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y
Int J Surg; 2015 Aug; 20():75-9. PubMed ID: 26079498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Le Fort partial colpocleisis as an effective treatment option for advanced apical prolapse in elderly women.
Park JY; Han SJ; Kim JH; Chun KC; Lee TS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 58(2):206-211. PubMed ID: 30910140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Le Fort colpocleisis: An evaluation of results and quality of life at intermediate-term follow-up.
Ertas IE; Balıkoğlu M; Biler A
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):102069. PubMed ID: 33476811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies.
Zhu Q; Shu H; Du G; Dai Z
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():40-43. PubMed ID: 29455045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of reconstructive vaginal surgery on quality of life and sexual functions in postmenopausal women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse in intermediate-term follow-up.
Karaca SY
Post Reprod Health; 2021 Sep; 27(3):145-150. PubMed ID: 33906490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction of Le Fort colpocleisis for the treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse.
Wang YT; Zhang K; Wang HF; Yang JF; Ying Y; Han JS
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):879-884. PubMed ID: 32601781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bilateral minimal tension sacrospinous fixation in pelvic organ prolapse: an observational study.
Mothes AR; Wanzke L; Radosa MP; Runnebaum IB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():1-5. PubMed ID: 25766786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination Ba and D Guide the Selection of Operation for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
J Invest Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):438-445. PubMed ID: 30574821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prospective cohort study on the outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments in treating stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Ren C; Song XC; Zhu L; Ai FF; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Chen J; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):369-373. PubMed ID: 28647958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women aged 70 years and over.
Ng SC; Chen GD
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26927252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of uterine preservation on long-term subjective outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Ng SC; Tsui KP; Huang L; Chen GD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():167-171. PubMed ID: 31299523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvic Symptoms, Body Image, and Regret after LeFort Colpocleisis: A Long-Term Follow-Up.
Wang X; Chen Y; Hua K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):415-419. PubMed ID: 28027972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colpocleisis surgery in women over 80 years old with severe triple compartment pelvic organ prolapse.
Krissi H; Aviram A; Ram E; Eitan R; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec; 195():206-209. PubMed ID: 26590892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
