222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35594581)
1. A deep learning framework to classify breast density with noisy labels regularization.
Lopez-Almazan H; Javier Pérez-Benito F; Larroza A; Perez-Cortes JC; Pollan M; Perez-Gomez B; Salas Trejo D; Casals M; Llobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 221():106885. PubMed ID: 35594581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast Dense Tissue Segmentation with Noisy Labels: A Hybrid Threshold-Based and Mask-Based Approach.
Larroza A; Pérez-Benito FJ; Perez-Cortes JC; Román M; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Llobet R
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Jul; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36010173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A deep learning system to obtain the optimal parameters for a threshold-based breast and dense tissue segmentation.
Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Perez-Cortes JC; Fuster-Baggetto A; Pollan M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105668. PubMed ID: 32755754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.
Lee J; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29363774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.
Lehman CD; Yala A; Schuster T; Dontchos B; Bahl M; Swanson K; Barzilay R
Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30325282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated Breast Density Assessment in MRI Using Deep Learning and Radiomics: Strategies for Reducing Inter-Observer Variability.
Jing X; Wielema M; Monroy-Gonzalez AG; Stams TRG; Mahesh SVK; Oudkerk M; Sijens PE; Dorrius MD; van Ooijen PMA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jul; 60(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 37846440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
Østerås BH; Martinsen AC; Brandal SH; Chaudhry KN; Eben E; Haakenaasen U; Falk RS; Skaane P
Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of Mammographic Breast Microcalcifications Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network: A BI-RADS-Based Approach.
Schönenberger C; Hejduk P; Ciritsis A; Marcon M; Rossi C; Boss A
Invest Radiol; 2021 Apr; 56(4):224-231. PubMed ID: 33038095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep Learning Predicts Interval and Screening-detected Cancer from Screening Mammograms: A Case-Case-Control Study in 6369 Women.
Zhu X; Wolfgruber TK; Leong L; Jensen M; Scott C; Winham S; Sadowski P; Vachon C; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
Radiology; 2021 Dec; 301(3):550-558. PubMed ID: 34491131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A New Computer-Aided Diagnosis System with Modified Genetic Feature Selection for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Masses in Mammograms.
Boumaraf S; Liu X; Ferkous C; Ma X
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7695207. PubMed ID: 32462017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation.
Alshafeiy TI; Wadih A; Nicholson BT; Rochman CM; Peppard HR; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W36-W41. PubMed ID: 28504593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
Dratsch T; Chen X; Rezazade Mehrizi M; Kloeckner R; Mähringer-Kunz A; Püsken M; Baeßler B; Sauer S; Maintz D; Pinto Dos Santos D
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222176. PubMed ID: 37129490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):41. PubMed ID: 31228956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast density prediction from low and standard dose mammograms using deep learning: effect of image resolution and model training approach on prediction quality.
Squires S; Harkness EF; Mackenzie A; Evans DG; Howell SJ; Astley SM
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38701765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories.
Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Peng H; Luo Y; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):314-321. PubMed ID: 29159811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in determining breast density according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS® Atlas.
Pesce K; Tajerian M; Chico MJ; Swiecicki MP; Boietti B; Frangella MJ; Benitez S
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020; 62(6):481-486. PubMed ID: 32493654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
