These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35595183)

  • 1. The effect of hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media in donor oocyte cycles and autologous oocyte cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Heymann D; Vidal L; Shoham Z; Kostova E; Showell M; Or Y
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Jun; 37(7):1451-1469. PubMed ID: 35595183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies.
    Heymann D; Vidal L; Or Y; Shoham Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Sep; 9(9):CD007421. PubMed ID: 32876946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of seminal plasma to female genital tract prior to embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology cycles (IVF, ICSI and frozen embryo transfer).
    Ata B; Abou-Setta AM; Seyhan A; Buckett W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 2(2):CD011809. PubMed ID: 29489026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis.
    Bosdou JK; Venetis CA; Tarlatzis BC; Grimbizis GF; Kolibianakis EM
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):491-505. PubMed ID: 30689865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of an IVF prediction model for donor oocytes: a retrospective analysis of 10 877 embryo transfers.
    Fitzgerald O; Newman J; Rombauts L; Polyakov A; Chambers GM
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Oct; 39(10):2274-2286. PubMed ID: 39173599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IVF outcomes in obese donor oocyte recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jungheim ES; Schon SB; Schulte MB; DeUgarte DA; Fowler SA; Tuuli MG
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2720-7. PubMed ID: 23847110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies.
    Bontekoe S; Heineman MJ; Johnson N; Blake D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD007421. PubMed ID: 24567053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
    Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Season at the time of oocyte collection and frozen embryo transfer outcomes.
    Leathersich SJ; Roche CS; Walls M; Nathan E; Hart RJ
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1714-1722. PubMed ID: 37407029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Live birth rate after female fertility preservation for cancer or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the three main techniques; embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
    Fraison E; Huberlant S; Labrune E; Cavalieri M; Montagut M; Brugnon F; Courbiere B
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Mar; 38(3):489-502. PubMed ID: 36421038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.
    Hipp HS; Gaskins AJ; Nagy ZP; Capelouto SM; Shapiro DB; Spencer JB
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):847-858. PubMed ID: 32142582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endometriosis and oocyte quality: an analysis of 13 614 donor oocyte recipient and autologous IVF cycles.
    Kamath MS; Subramanian V; Antonisamy B; Sunkara SK
    Hum Reprod Open; 2022; 2022(3):hoac025. PubMed ID: 35747401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
    Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles.
    Cornet-Bartolomé D; Rodriguez A; García D; Barragán M; Vassena R
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2262-2271. PubMed ID: 32856058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do we need to measure progesterone in oocyte donation cycles? A retrospective analysis evaluating cumulative live birth rates and embryo quality.
    Racca A; De Munck N; Santos-Ribeiro S; Drakopoulos P; Errazuriz J; Galvao A; Popovic-Todorovic B; Mackens S; De Vos M; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):167-174. PubMed ID: 31953546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Live birth and perinatal outcomes using cryopreserved oocytes: an analysis of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database from 2000 to 2016 using three clinical models.
    Mascarenhas M; Mehlawat H; Kirubakaran R; Bhandari H; Choudhary M
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1416-1426. PubMed ID: 33313698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles.
    Law YJ; Zhang N; Venetis CA; Chambers GM; Harris K
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 31398253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
    Glujovsky D; Farquhar C; Quinteiro Retamar AM; Alvarez Sedo CR; Blake D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; (6):CD002118. PubMed ID: 27357126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial oocyte activation to improve reproductive outcomes in women with previous fertilization failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Sfontouris IA; Nastri CO; Lima ML; Tahmasbpourmarzouni E; Raine-Fenning N; Martins WP
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1831-41. PubMed ID: 26082476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.