These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35596813)

  • 21. Additional value of deep learning computed tomographic angiography-based fractional flow reserve in detecting coronary stenosis and predicting outcomes.
    Li Y; Qiu H; Hou Z; Zheng J; Li J; Yin Y; Gao R
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Jan; 63(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 33423530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of diabetes mellitus on the diagnostic performance of machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a multicenter study.
    Xue Y; Zheng MW; Hou Y; Zhou F; Li JH; Wang YN; Liu CY; Zhou CS; Zhang JY; Yu MM; Zhang B; Zhang DM; Yi Y; Xu L; Hu XH; Lu GM; Tang CX; Zhang LJ
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):3778-3789. PubMed ID: 35020012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic Performance of CCTA and CT-FFR for the Detection of CAD in TAVR Work-Up.
    Peper J; Becker LM; van den Berg H; Bor WL; Brouwer J; Nijenhuis VJ; van Ginkel DJ; Rensing BJMW; Ten Berg JM; Timmers L; Leiner T; Swaans MJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jun; 15(11):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 35680194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of scan and patient parameters on the diagnostic performance of AI for detecting coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography.
    Jonas RA; Barkovich E; Choi AD; Griffin WF; Riess J; Marques H; Chang HJ; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Thompson RC; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Guglielmo M; Al-Mallah MH; Jennings RS; Crabtree TR; Earls JP
    Clin Imaging; 2022 Apr; 84():149-158. PubMed ID: 35217284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
    Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamic Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion With a Whole-Heart Coverage Scanner in Addition to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Derived.
    Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Soldi M; Del Torto A; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Olivares P; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 12(12):2460-2471. PubMed ID: 31005531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of coronary stenosis location on diagnostic performance of machine learning-based fractional flow reserve from CT angiography.
    Renker M; Baumann S; Hamm CW; Tesche C; Kim WK; Savage RH; Coenen A; Nieman K; De Geer J; Persson A; Kruk M; Kepka C; Yang DH; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021; 15(6):492-498. PubMed ID: 34119471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic performance of deep learning-based vessel extraction and stenosis detection on coronary computed tomography angiography for coronary artery disease: a multi-reader multi-case study.
    Yang W; Chen C; Yang Y; Chen L; Yang C; Gong L; Wang J; Shi F; Wu D; Yan F
    Radiol Med; 2023 Mar; 128(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 36800112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in comparison with invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis: results from the prospective multicentre FIGURE-OUT (Functional Imaging criteria for GUiding REview of invasive coronary angiOgraphy, intravascular Ultrasound, and coronary computed Tomographic angiography) study.
    Doh JH; Koo BK; Nam CW; Kim JH; Min JK; Nakazato R; Silalahi T; Prawira H; Choi H; Lee SY; Namgung J; Kwon SU; Kwak JJ; Lee WR
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Aug; 15(8):870-7. PubMed ID: 24513881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology: Predictive Modeling Results From the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Determinants of Myocardial Ischemia (CREDENCE) Trial.
    Stuijfzand WJ; van Rosendael AR; Lin FY; Chang HJ; van den Hoogen IJ; Gianni U; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Thompson R; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Al-Mallah MH; Lu Y; Berman DS; Narula J; Min JK; Bax JJ; Shaw LJ;
    JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 5(12):1338-1348. PubMed ID: 32822476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stable patients with suspected myocardial ischemia: comparison of machine-learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve and stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect myocardial ischemia.
    Lossnitzer D; Klenantz S; Andre F; Goerich J; Schoepf UJ; Pazzo KL; Sommer A; Brado M; Gückel F; Sokiranski R; Becher T; Akin I; Buss SJ; Baumann S
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):34. PubMed ID: 35120459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR(CT)) compared to invasive FFR: a sub-group analysis from the DISCOVER-FLOW and DeFACTO studies.
    Nakanishi R; Matsumoto S; Alani A; Li D; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Koo BK; Min JK; Budoff MJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1251-9. PubMed ID: 25904402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Artificial Intelligence (Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Network) for Calcium Deblooming in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Feasibility Study.
    Sun Z; Ng CKC
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35454039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Qiao HY; Tang CX; Schoepf UJ; Tesche C; Bayer RR; Giovagnoli DA; Todd Hudson H; Zhou CS; Yan J; Lu MJ; Zhou F; Lu GM; Jiang JW; Zhang LJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5841-5851. PubMed ID: 32462444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study.
    Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Fazzari F; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 1):1487-1497. PubMed ID: 30343073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic Accuracy and Generalizability of a Deep Learning-Based Fully Automated Algorithm for Coronary Artery Stenosis Detection on CCTA: A Multi-Centre Registry Study.
    Xu L; He Y; Luo N; Guo N; Hong M; Jia X; Wang Z; Yang Z
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():707508. PubMed ID: 34805297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Subtraction coronary CT angiography using second-generation 320-detector row CT.
    Yoshioka K; Tanaka R; Muranaka K; Sasaki T; Ueda T; Chiba T; Takeda K; Sugawara T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():51-8. PubMed ID: 25721727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnostic value of comprehensive on-site and off-site coronary CT angiography for identifying hemodynamically obstructive coronary artery disease.
    Bom MJ; Driessen RS; Kurata A; van Diemen PA; Everaars H; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; van Rossum AC; Taylor CA; Min JK; Leipsic JA; Danad I; Knaapen P
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 32540206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp in a clinical setting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
    Zhang LJ; Wang Y; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Bayer RR; Qi L; Cao J; Zhou CS; Zhao YE; Li X; Gong JB; Jin Z; Lu GM
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Mar; 26(3):797-806. PubMed ID: 26382844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic accuracy of on-site coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease.
    Peper J; Schaap J; Rensing BJWM; Kelder JC; Swaans MJ
    Neth Heart J; 2022 Mar; 30(3):160-171. PubMed ID: 34910279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.