160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35597731)
1. The Acute Complications After Surgery for Penile Carcinoma and Strategies for Their Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Sood A; Rudzinski JK; Spiess PE; Pettaway CA
Semin Oncol Nurs; 2022 Jun; 38(3):151285. PubMed ID: 35597731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risks and Benefits of Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Penile Cancer Guidelines Panel.
Robinson R; Marconi L; MacPepple E; Hakenberg OW; Watkin N; Yuan Y; Lam T; MacLennan S; Adewuyi TE; Coscione A; Minhas SS; Compérat EM; Necchi A
Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 29703686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current practice patterns of society of urologic oncology members in performing inguinal lymph node staging/therapy for penile cancer: A survey study.
Marilin N; Master VA; Pettaway CA; Spiess PE
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):439.e9-439.e15. PubMed ID: 33775532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Update in the surgical principles and therapeutic outcomes of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer.
Ercole CE; Pow-Sang JM; Spiess PE
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 21481617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications.
Spiess PE; Hernandez MS; Pettaway CA
World J Urol; 2009 Apr; 27(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 18762945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.
Protzel C; Alcaraz A; Horenblas S; Pizzocaro G; Zlotta A; Hakenberg OW
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1075-88. PubMed ID: 19264390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Penile Cancer: Contemporary Lymph Node Management.
O'Brien JS; Perera M; Manning T; Bozin M; Cabarkapa S; Chen E; Lawrentschuk N
J Urol; 2017 Jun; 197(6):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 28115191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.
Correa AF; Handorf E; Joshi SS; Geynisman DM; Kutikov A; Chen DY; Uzzo RG; Viterbo R; Greenberg RE; Smaldone MC
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 29248557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.
Heyns CF; Fleshner N; Sangar V; Schlenker B; Yuvaraja TB; van Poppel H
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. PubMed ID: 20691885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma.
Ravi R
Br J Urol; 1993 Dec; 72(6):941-5. PubMed ID: 8306161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Patel KN; Salunke A; Bakshi G; Jayaprakash D; Pandya SJ
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):112.e11-112.e22. PubMed ID: 34895995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database.
Chua KJ; Balraj V; Patel HV; Srivastava A; Doppalapudi SK; Elsamra SE; Jang TL; Singer EA; Ghodoussipour SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Jan; 236(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 36519902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility, complications and oncologic results of a limited inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer.
Tsaur I; Biegel C; Gust K; Huesch T; Borgmann H; Brandt MP; Kurosch M; Reiter M; Bartsch G; Schilling D; Haferkamp A
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):486-95. PubMed ID: 26200541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morbidity and risk factors for complications of inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer.
Jeanne-Julien A; Bouchot O; De Vergie S; Branchereau J; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Rigaud J
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 36208315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.
Matin SF; Cormier JN; Ward JF; Pisters LL; Wood CG; Dinney CP; Royal RE; Huang X; Pettaway CA
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1068-74. PubMed ID: 23551693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: a historical cohort study and risk-factor analysis.
Stuiver MM; Djajadiningrat RS; Graafland NM; Vincent AD; Lucas C; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2013 Sep; 64(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 23490726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value and efficiency of sentinel lymph node diagnostics in patients with penile carcinoma with palpable inguinal lymph nodes as a new multimodal, minimally invasive approach.
Lützen U; Zuhayra M; Marx M; Zhao Y; Colberg C; Knüpfer S; Baumann R; Kähler KC; Jünemann KP; Naumann CM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2313-2323. PubMed ID: 27519598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes.
Koifman L; Hampl D; Koifman N; Vides AJ; Ornellas AA
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2086-92. PubMed ID: 23770135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fascia lata preservation during inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: rationale and outcome.
Yao K; Zou ZJ; Li ZS; Zhou FJ; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Li YH; Han H
Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):642-7. PubMed ID: 23876593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Salvage surgical resection for isolated locally recurrent inguinal lymph node metastasis of penile cancer: international study collaboration.
Baumgarten AS; Alhammali E; Hakky TS; Espiritu PN; Pow-Sang JM; Sexton WJ; Lockhart JL; Protzel C; Hakenberg O; Muneer A; Spiess PE
J Urol; 2014 Sep; 192(3):760-4. PubMed ID: 24603104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
