These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35598396)

  • 21. Do detection-based warning strategies improve vehicle yielding behavior at uncontrolled midblock crosswalks?
    Hussain Q; Alhajyaseen WKM; Pirdavani A; Brijs K; Shaaban K; Brijs T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106166. PubMed ID: 33962351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting the intention of distracted pedestrians at road crossings.
    O'Dell AL; Filtness AJ; Morris AP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Aug; 173():106707. PubMed ID: 35594743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Safety effects of law enforcement cameras at non-signalized crosswalks: A case study in China.
    Li H; Zhang Z; Sze NN; Hu H; Ding H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106124. PubMed ID: 33873136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigating pedestrian waiting time at semi-controlled crossing locations: Application of multi-state models for recurrent events analysis.
    Zhang Y; Qiao Y; Fricker JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105437. PubMed ID: 32036105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of the Effect of Human-Machine Co-Driving Vehicle on Pedestrian Crossing Speed at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Road Sections: A VR-Based Case Study.
    Wang K; Xu L; Jiang H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 35742456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Young and older adult pedestrians' behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars.
    Dommes A; Merlhiot G; Lobjois R; Dang NT; Vienne F; Boulo J; Oliver AH; Crétual A; Cavallo V
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106256. PubMed ID: 34146938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigation of traffic and safety behavior of pedestrians while texting or web-surfing.
    Ropaka M; Nikolaou D; Yannis G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(6):389-394. PubMed ID: 32500788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing distracted pedestrian behavior using Bluetooth beacon technology: A crossover trial.
    Schwebel DC; Hasan R; Griffin R; Hasan R; Hoque MA; Karim MY; Luo K; Johnston A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106253. PubMed ID: 34126275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Social Force Model-Based Safety Evaluation of Intersections in Arterials Considering the Pedestrian Yield Rule.
    Yao J; Li Y; He J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Safer pedestrian crossing facilities on low-speed roads: Comparison of innovative treatments.
    Hussain Q; Alhajyaseen WKM; Kharbeche M; Almallah M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106908. PubMed ID: 36495827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distracted pedestrian behavior: An observational study of risk by situational environments.
    Schwebel DC; Canter MF; Hasan R; Griffin R; White TR; Johnston A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(6):346-351. PubMed ID: 35617465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploring the impacts of built environment on pedestrian injury severity involving distracted driving.
    Khan NA; Habib MA
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():97-108. PubMed ID: 35249632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.
    Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment pedestrian crossing safety using vehicle-pedestrian interaction data through two different approaches: Fixed videography (FV) vs In-Motion Videography (IMV).
    Sheykhfard A; Haghighi F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105661. PubMed ID: 32634763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of drivers and pedestrians' behaviors at signalized mid-block Danish offset crosswalks using Bayesian networks.
    Kutela B; Teng H
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():75-83. PubMed ID: 31235238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survey about pedestrian safety and attitudes toward automated traffic enforcement in Washington, D.C.
    Cicchino JB; Wells JK; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(4):414-23. PubMed ID: 24471367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pedestrian crossing behaviors at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in developing world.
    Zhang C; Zhou B; Qiu TZ; Liu S
    J Safety Res; 2018 Feb; 64():145-154. PubMed ID: 29636163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of driver performance with a prototype cyber physical mid-block crossing advanced warning system.
    Angulo AV; Smith BL
    J Safety Res; 2021 Dec; 79():237-245. PubMed ID: 34848004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Raised crosswalks on entrance to the roundabout-a case study on effectiveness of treatment on pedestrian safety and convenience.
    Candappa N; Stephan K; Fotheringham N; Lenné MG; Corben B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 24867573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.
    Rettenmaier M; Dinkel S; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103438. PubMed ID: 33895469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.