140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35598923)
1. Performance of the supervised learning algorithms in sex estimation of the proximal femur: A comparative study in contemporary Egyptian and Turkish samples.
H Attia M; H Attia M; Tarek Farghaly Y; Ahmed El-Sayed Abulnoor B; Curate F
Sci Justice; 2022 May; 62(3):288-309. PubMed ID: 35598923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the use of machine learning algorithms in forensic anthropology.
Nikita E; Nikitas P
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Nov; 47():101771. PubMed ID: 32795933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex estimation: a comparison of techniques based on binary logistic, probit and cumulative probit regression, linear and quadratic discriminant analysis, neural networks, and naïve Bayes classification using ordinal variables.
Nikita E; Nikitas P
Int J Legal Med; 2020 May; 134(3):1213-1225. PubMed ID: 31444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical characterization and classification of colon microarray gene expression data using multiple machine learning paradigms.
Maniruzzaman M; Jahanur Rahman M; Ahammed B; Abedin MM; Suri HS; Biswas M; El-Baz A; Bangeas P; Tsoulfas G; Suri JS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 176():173-193. PubMed ID: 31200905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex estimation from long bones: a machine learning approach.
Knecht S; Santos F; Ardagna Y; Alunni V; Adalian P; Nogueira L
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Nov; 137(6):1887-1895. PubMed ID: 37526736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Purkait's triangle revisited: role in sex and ancestry estimation.
Attia MH; Attia MH; Farghaly YT; Abulnoor BAE; Manolis SK; Purkait R; Ubelaker DH
Forensic Sci Res; 2022; 7(3):440-455. PubMed ID: 36353330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Appropriate Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Mesothelioma Detection and Cure.
Saxena K; Zamani AS; Bhavani R; Sagar KVD; Bangare PM; Ashwini S; Rahin SA
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():2318101. PubMed ID: 35845952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing linear discriminant analysis and supervised learning algorithms for binary classification-A method comparison study.
Graf R; Zeldovich M; Friedrich S
Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200098. PubMed ID: 36529690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine Learning Based Identification of Microseismic Signals Using Characteristic Parameters.
Peng K; Tang Z; Dong L; Sun D
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
Ozcan I; Aydin H; Cetinkaya A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Oct; 23(10):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 36308351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing supervised and semi-supervised Machine Learning Models on Diagnosing Breast Cancer.
Al-Azzam N; Shatnawi I
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2021 Feb; 62():53-64. PubMed ID: 33489117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying chronic disease patients using predictive algorithms in pharmacy administrative claims: an application in rheumatoid arthritis.
Maksabedian Hernandez EJ; Tingzon I; Ampil L; Tiu J
J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):1272-1279. PubMed ID: 34704871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Novel Blunge Calibration Intelligent Feature Classification Model for the Prediction of Hypothyroid Disease.
Devi MS; Kumar VD; Brezulianu A; Geman O; Arif M
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying of Home Discharge Possibility in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Secondary Analysis.
Imura T; Toda H; Iwamoto Y; Inagawa T; Imada N; Tanaka R; Inoue Y; Araki H; Araki O
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 Oct; 30(10):106011. PubMed ID: 34325274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evolutionary model for sleep quality analytics using fuzzy system.
Hangaragi S; Nizampatnam N; Kaliyaperumal D; Özer T
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 Oct; 237(10):1215-1227. PubMed ID: 37667998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening nonrandomized studies for medical systematic reviews: a comparative study of classifiers.
Bekhuis T; Demner-Fushman D
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 22677493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex determination from the femur in Portuguese populations with classical and machine-learning classifiers.
Curate F; Umbelino C; Perinha A; Nogueira C; Silva AM; Cunha E
J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Nov; 52():75-81. PubMed ID: 28866285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design of Electronic Nose Detection System for Apple Quality Grading Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation and K-Nearest Neighbor Support Vector Machine.
Zou X; Wang C; Luo M; Ren Q; Liu Y; Zhang S; Bai Y; Meng J; Zhang W; Su SW
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 35458982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine learning-based monosaccharide profiling for tissue-specific classification of Wolfiporia extensa samples.
Hsiung SY; Deng SX; Li J; Huang SY; Liaw CK; Huang SY; Wang CC; Hsieh YSY
Carbohydr Polym; 2023 Dec; 322():121338. PubMed ID: 37839831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
