These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. [Removal of an intrauterine device (IUD) and uterine curettage. A report of experiences]. Berg R Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(9):576-9. PubMed ID: 3727858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cytologic atypias in the uterine fluid of intrauterine contraceptive device users. Kobayashi TK; Casslén B; Stormby N Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 6573085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Aluminum silicate-containing psammoma bodies in a cervicovaginal smear (Pap): cytological, ultrastructural, and radiographic microprobe studies. Li S; Boudousquie AC; Baloch ZW; Minda JM; Gupta PK Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Aug; 21(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 10425050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of two procedures for routine IUD exchange in women with positive Pap smears for actinomyces-like organisms. Merki-Feld GS; Rosselli M; Imthurn B Contraception; 2008 Mar; 77(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 18279687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Actinomycosis of the appendix and pelvis. Altanis E J Reprod Med; 2009 Jun; 54(6):411-2; author reply 412. PubMed ID: 19642234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [The morphology of the endometrium, cytology of vaginal smears and sex hormone excretion of women following prolonged use of loop type intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Latik IV Pediatr Akus Ginekol; 1972 Oct; 5():50-2. PubMed ID: 4658822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal. Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Intrauterine device appendicitis: an exceptional complication]. Cuillier F; Ben Ghalem S; Haffaf Y J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Feb; 32(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12592185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Local and general reactions of women to intrauterine contraceptive device (author's transl)]. Nyklícek O; Trávnícek J Cas Lek Cesk; 1974 Aug; 113(35):1056-9. PubMed ID: 4410035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [The effect of two contraceptive methods (EP vs. IUD) in relation to inflammatory changes and CIN]. Cipolla L; Manzi P; Giannetta G; Ferrante B; Zagni R Minerva Ginecol; 1993 Jun; 45(6):315-20. PubMed ID: 8355888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Cytological study of cases using intrauterine devices (IUD) over a long period]. Ishihama T; Toshibe T; Imai N; Shima S Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1967 Oct; 16(10):980-4. PubMed ID: 5631447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]