These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3560079)

  • 41. [Intrauterine devices and uterine cancer--statistical re-evaluation of Ishibama's data].
    Ko D
    Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1968 Jul; 17(7):606-14. PubMed ID: 5755143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Experiences with the Margulies intrauterine device].
    Johnson FL
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1967; 4(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 5628668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pelvic actinomycosis in the presence of an endocervical contraceptive device. Report of a case.
    Brenner RW; Gehring SW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Jan; 29(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 6017947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Experimental study of a cupro-contraceptive intrauterine device (copper 7: Gravigarde)].
    Levrier M
    Gynecologie; 1974; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 4420221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cryosurgical treatment of neoplasia of the uterine cervix.
    Crisp WE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1972 Apr; 39(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 5018893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Jobson VW
    Am Fam Physician; 1981 Aug; 24(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7258081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Removal of an intrauterine device (IUD) and uterine curettage. A report of experiences].
    Berg R
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(9):576-9. PubMed ID: 3727858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cytologic atypias in the uterine fluid of intrauterine contraceptive device users.
    Kobayashi TK; Casslén B; Stormby N
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 6573085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Aluminum silicate-containing psammoma bodies in a cervicovaginal smear (Pap): cytological, ultrastructural, and radiographic microprobe studies.
    Li S; Boudousquie AC; Baloch ZW; Minda JM; Gupta PK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Aug; 21(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 10425050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of two procedures for routine IUD exchange in women with positive Pap smears for actinomyces-like organisms.
    Merki-Feld GS; Rosselli M; Imthurn B
    Contraception; 2008 Mar; 77(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 18279687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Actinomycosis of the appendix and pelvis.
    Altanis E
    J Reprod Med; 2009 Jun; 54(6):411-2; author reply 412. PubMed ID: 19642234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Intrauterine contraceptive device-related actinomycosis infection presenting as an incarcerated inguinal hernia.
    Dharmadhikari D; Dharmadhikari R; Macdonald J; Beukenholdt R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Aug; 33(4):595-7. PubMed ID: 17688639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [The morphology of the endometrium, cytology of vaginal smears and sex hormone excretion of women following prolonged use of loop type intrauterine contraceptive devices].
    Latik IV
    Pediatr Akus Ginekol; 1972 Oct; 5():50-2. PubMed ID: 4658822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
    P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Intrauterine device appendicitis: an exceptional complication].
    Cuillier F; Ben Ghalem S; Haffaf Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Feb; 32(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12592185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Occult uterine perforation caused by an intrauterine device].
    Tapia JE; Altermatt HJ
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(18):1146-9. PubMed ID: 3788344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Local and general reactions of women to intrauterine contraceptive device (author's transl)].
    Nyklícek O; Trávnícek J
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1974 Aug; 113(35):1056-9. PubMed ID: 4410035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [The effect of two contraceptive methods (EP vs. IUD) in relation to inflammatory changes and CIN].
    Cipolla L; Manzi P; Giannetta G; Ferrante B; Zagni R
    Minerva Ginecol; 1993 Jun; 45(6):315-20. PubMed ID: 8355888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Cytological study of cases using intrauterine devices (IUD) over a long period].
    Ishihama T; Toshibe T; Imai N; Shima S
    Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1967 Oct; 16(10):980-4. PubMed ID: 5631447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cytologic studies after insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Ishihama A; Kagabu T; Imai T; Shima M
    Acta Cytol; 1970 Jan; 14(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 4189088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.