These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35601453)

  • 21. Others' actions reduce crossmodal integration in peripersonal space.
    Heed T; Habets B; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Curr Biol; 2010 Aug; 20(15):1345-9. PubMed ID: 20619649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task.
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 16035346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. About the unidirectionality of interference: insight from the musical Stroop effect.
    Grégoire L; Perruchet P; Poulin-Charronnat B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2071-89. PubMed ID: 24697690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mental representations of partner task cause interference in picture naming.
    Brehm L; Taschenberger L; Meyer A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Aug; 199():102888. PubMed ID: 31349029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the resolution of response, semantic and task conflict in the colour-word Stroop task.
    Parris BA; Wadsley MG; Arabaci G; Hasshim N; Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Brain Struct Funct; 2021 May; 226(4):1241-1252. PubMed ID: 33608822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Priority for one's own stimulus in joint performance: evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Kato K; Yoshizaki K; Kimura Y
    Neuroreport; 2016 May; 27(8):564-7. PubMed ID: 27043796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mapping symbols to response modalities: interference effects on Stroop-like tasks.
    Baldo JV; Shimamura AP; Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 9599993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of action inhibition for behavioral control in joint action.
    Maier ME; Liepelt R; Steinhauser M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Feb; 30(1):200-211. PubMed ID: 35971035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The performance monitoring system is attuned to others' actions during dyadic motor interactions.
    Moreau Q; Tieri G; Era V; Aglioti SM; Candidi M
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Dec; 33(1):222-234. PubMed ID: 35203090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Language production in a shared task: Cumulative Semantic Interference from self- and other-produced context words.
    Hoedemaker RS; Ernst J; Meyer AS; Belke E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():55-63. PubMed ID: 27907879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The predictability of a partner's actions modulates the sense of joint agency.
    Bolt NK; Loehr JD
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():60-65. PubMed ID: 28110236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stroop interference and negative priming in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Vitkovitch M; Bishop S; Dancey C; Richards A
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1570-6. PubMed ID: 11985838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recent language experience influences cross-language activation in bilinguals with different scripts.
    Li C; Wang M; Lin CY
    Int J Billing; 2017 Aug; 21(4):500-517. PubMed ID: 29056862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Event-related potentials to Stroop and reverse Stroop stimuli.
    Atkinson CM; Drysdale KA; Fulham WR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Jan; 47(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 12543443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The contribution of meaning to the detection of task conflict.
    Hershman R; Levin Y; Tzelgov J; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Sep; 74(9):1553-1561. PubMed ID: 33629642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory feedback of one's own voice is used for high-level semantic monitoring: the "self-comprehension" hypothesis.
    Lind A; Hall L; Breidegard B; Balkenius C; Johansson P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():166. PubMed ID: 24734014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.