209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35603510)
1. Piflufolastat F-18 (
Voter AF; Werner RA; Pienta KJ; Gorin MA; Pomper MG; Solnes LB; Rowe SP
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2022 Jul; 22(7):681-694. PubMed ID: 35603510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image acquisition and interpretation of 18F-DCFPyL (piflufolastat F 18) PET/CT: How we do it.
Rowe SP; Voter AF; Werner RA; Zukotynski KA; Pomper MG; Gorin MA; Solnes LB
Can J Urol; 2023 Feb; 30(1):11432-11437. PubMed ID: 36779950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography with Piflufolastat F 18 for the Initial Diagnosis of Patients with Prostate Cancer in the United States.
Yee CW; Harvey MJ; Xin Y; Kirson NY
Pharmacoeconomics; 2024 Feb; 42(2):231-247. PubMed ID: 37934376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of piflufolastat F-18 PSMA PET imaging on clinical decision-making in prostate cancer across disease states: A retrospective review.
Arafa AT; Jain A; Skrobanek P; Humphrey B; Froelich JW; Antonarakis ES
Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(9):863-870. PubMed ID: 36999911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PSMA-Based [(18)F]DCFPyL PET/CT Is Superior to Conventional Imaging for Lesion Detection in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
Rowe SP; Macura KJ; Mena E; Blackford AL; Nadal R; Antonarakis ES; Eisenberger M; Carducci M; Fan H; Dannals RF; Chen Y; Mease RC; Szabo Z; Pomper MG; Cho SY
Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Jun; 18(3):411-9. PubMed ID: 27080322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT for Imaging of Prostate Cancer.
Rowe SP; Buck A; Bundschuh RA; Lapa C; Serfling SE; Derlin T; Higuchi T; Gorin MA; Pomper MG; Werner RA
Nuklearmedizin; 2022 Jun; 61(3):240-246. PubMed ID: 35030637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT with
Pienta KJ; Gorin MA; Rowe SP; Carroll PR; Pouliot F; Probst S; Saperstein L; Preston MA; Alva AS; Patnaik A; Durack JC; Stambler N; Lin T; Jensen J; Wong V; Siegel BA; Morris MJ
J Urol; 2021 Jul; 206(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 33634707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective Comparison of PET Imaging with PSMA-Targeted
Rowe SP; Li X; Trock BJ; Werner RA; Frey S; DiGianvittorio M; Bleiler JK; Reyes DK; Abdallah R; Pienta KJ; Gorin MA; Pomper MG
J Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 61(2):183-188. PubMed ID: 31451492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [ (68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer.
Dietlein M; Kobe C; Kuhnert G; Stockter S; Fischer T; Schomäcker K; Schmidt M; Dietlein F; Zlatopolskiy BD; Krapf P; Richarz R; Neubauer S; Drzezga A; Neumaier B
Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Aug; 17(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 26013479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of prostate cancer with
Bodar YJL; Jansen BHE; van der Voorn JP; Zwezerijnen GJC; Meijer D; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; Boellaard R; Hendrikse NH; Hoekstra OS; van Moorselaar RJA; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2439-2446. PubMed ID: 33079250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
Mena E; Lindenberg ML; Turkbey IB; Shih JH; Harmon SA; Lim I; Lin F; Adler S; Eclarinal P; McKinney YL; Citrin D; Dahut W; Wood BJ; Krishnasamy V; Chang R; Levy E; Merino M; Pinto P; Eary JF; Choyke PL
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jun; 61(6):881-889. PubMed ID: 31676732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective Evaluation of
Gaur S; Mena E; Harmon SA; Lindenberg ML; Adler S; Ton AT; Shih JH; Mehralivand S; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Mease RC; Pomper MG; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):652-659. PubMed ID: 32755168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
Wondergem M; van der Zant FM; Broos WAM; Roeleveld TA; Donker R; Ten Oever D; Geenen RWF; Knol RJJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Feb; 48(2):521-531. PubMed ID: 32719916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [
Bauman G; Martin P; Thiessen JD; Taylor R; Moussa M; Gaed M; Rachinsky I; Kassam Z; Chin J; Pautler S; Lee TY; Valliant JF; Ward A
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):702-706. PubMed ID: 28753797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraindividual Comparison of
Giesel FL; Will L; Lawal I; Lengana T; Kratochwil C; Vorster M; Neels O; Reyneke F; Haberkon U; Kopka K; Sathekge M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1076-1080. PubMed ID: 29269569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging Prostate Cancer: Clinical Utility of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen.
Kuppermann D; Calais J; Marks LS
J Urol; 2022 Apr; 207(4):769-778. PubMed ID: 35085002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the Staging/Restaging Performance of 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lee MT; Lin CL; Kao CH
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 May; 44(5):365-376. PubMed ID: 30888999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
