These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35604025)

  • 1. Comparison of different response variables in genomic prediction using GBLUP and ssGBLUP methods in Iranian Holstein cattle.
    Afrazandeh M; Abdolahi-Arpanahi R; Abbasi MA; Kashan NEJ; Torshizi RV
    J Dairy Res; 2022 May; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 35604025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative SNP weighting for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluation of stature in US Holsteins in the presence of selected sequence variants.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Legarra A; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):10012-10019. PubMed ID: 31495612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
    Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Milk Production Traits in Philippine Dairy Buffaloes.
    Herrera JRV; Flores EB; Duijvesteijn N; Moghaddar N; van der Werf JH
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():682576. PubMed ID: 34777455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
    BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.
    Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
    Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle in Tanzania: A route to productivity gains in smallholder dairy systems.
    Mrode R; Ojango J; Ekine-Dzivenu C; Aliloo H; Gibson J; Okeyo MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Nov; 104(11):11779-11789. PubMed ID: 34364643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of genomic prediction accuracy using different selection and evaluation approaches in a simulated Korean beef cattle population.
    Nwogwugwu CP; Kim Y; Choi H; Lee JH; Lee SH
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 33(12):1912-1921. PubMed ID: 32819072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP.
    Brzáková M; Bauer J; Steyn Y; Šplíchal J; Fulínová D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36334266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction and genetic correlations estimated for milk production and fatty acid traits in Walloon Holstein cattle using random regression models.
    Paiva JT; Mota RR; Lopes PS; Hammami H; Vanderick S; Oliveira HR; Veroneze R; Silva FFE; Gengler N
    J Dairy Res; 2022 Sep; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 36062502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
    Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-step genomic evaluation for growth traits in a Mexican Braunvieh cattle population.
    Valerio-Hernández JE; Ruíz-Flores A; Nilforooshan MA; Pérez-Rodríguez P
    Anim Biosci; 2023 Jul; 36(7):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 36915917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic Selection for Milk Production Traits in Xinjiang Brown Cattle.
    Zhang M; Luo H; Xu L; Shi Y; Zhou J; Wang D; Zhang X; Huang X; Wang Y
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35049759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Opportunities for genomic selection in American mink: A simulation study.
    Karimi K; Sargolzaei M; Plastow GS; Wang Z; Miar Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213873. PubMed ID: 30870528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short communication: investigation of the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle.
    Gautason E; Sahana G; Su G; Benjamínsson BH; Jóhannesson G; Guldbrandtsen B
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Jul; 99(7):. PubMed ID: 33942082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing genomic prediction for Australian Red dairy cattle.
    van den Berg I; MacLeod IM; Reich CM; Breen EJ; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6276-6298. PubMed ID: 32331891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9026-34. PubMed ID: 26433415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.