These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35604481)

  • 1. A machine learning analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic liver surgery.
    Ruzzenente A; Bagante F; Poletto E; Campagnaro T; Conci S; De Bellis M; Pedrazzani C; Guglielmi A
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):8869-8880. PubMed ID: 35604481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Lin H; Bai Y; Yin M; Chen Z; Yu S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3732-3749. PubMed ID: 34406470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: The comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections.
    Tripke V; Huber T; Mittler J; Lang H; Heinrich S
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 Jul; 27(7):380-387. PubMed ID: 32162482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison and validation of three difficulty scoring systems in laparoscopic liver surgery: a retrospective analysis on 300 cases.
    Russolillo N; Maina C; Fleres F; Langella S; Lo Tesoriere R; Ferrero A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Dec; 34(12):5484-5494. PubMed ID: 31950272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of IWATE, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, and Southampton Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Scoring Systems for Predicting Intra and Postoperative Outcomes in Robotic Hepatectomy.
    Sucandy I; Ross SB; Adorno Flores J; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A
    Am Surg; 2024 Jul; 90(7):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 38520138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.
    Barron JO; Orabi D; Moro A; Quintini C; Berber E; Aucejo FN; Sasaki K; Kwon CD
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3601-3609. PubMed ID: 34031739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections.
    Linn YL; Wu AG; Han HS; Liu R; Chen KH; Fuks D; Soubrane O; Cherqui D; Geller D; Cheung TT; Edwin B; Aldrighetti L; Abu Hilal M; Troisi RI; Wakabayashi G; Goh BKP;
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2023 Jan; 30(1):36-59. PubMed ID: 35780493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.
    Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S; Krebs B
    BMC Surg; 2019 Nov; 19(1):179. PubMed ID: 31775813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Practicality Study of the Difficulty Scoring Systems DSS-B and DSS-ER in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.
    Yang J; Yang Z; Jia G; Xi Y; Xu Y; Li P; Han B; Hu X; Sun C
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jan; 29(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 30036137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in hepatolithiasis.
    Kim J; Cho JY; Han HS; Yoon YS; Choi Y; Lee JS; Lee B; Kim J
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 32152674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.
    Tanemura A; Mizuno S; Maeda K; Shinkai T; Ito T; Hayasaki A; Gyoten K; Fujii T; Iizawa Y; Murata Y; Kuriyama N; Kishiwada M; Sakurai H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9054-9063. PubMed ID: 35831677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies.
    Goh BKP; Prieto M; Syn N; Koh YX; Teo JY; Lee SY; Chung AY; Chan CY
    HPB (Oxford); 2021 May; 23(5):770-776. PubMed ID: 33023824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The difficulty grade of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with long-term outcomes.
    Lv X; Zhang L; Yu X; Yu H
    Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):881-888. PubMed ID: 36773170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive risk factors for resection surface-related complications after laparoscopic simultaneous resection of primary colorectal tumor and synchronous liver metastases: a single-center retrospective study.
    Une N; Kobayashi S; Kudo M; Sugimoto M; Kitaguchi D; Hasegawa H; Ando K; Ikeda K; Nishizawa Y; Tsukada Y; Ito M; Gotohda N
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Sep; 38(9):5006-5016. PubMed ID: 38992282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Based on the IWATE criteria: to investigate the influence of different surgical approaches on the perioperative outcomes of hepatectomy.
    Xie F; Ge J; Sheng W; Wang D; Liao W; Li E; Wu L; Lei J
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1044-1052. PubMed ID: 36109356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma by defining surgical difficulty.
    Periyasamy M; Cho JY; Ahn S; Han HS; Yoon YS; Choi Y; Jang JS; Kwon SU; Kim S; Choi JK; Guro H
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5209-5218. PubMed ID: 28526962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Benign Tumors and Lesions: A Case Matched Study with Propensity Score Matching.
    Wabitsch S; Kästner A; Haber PK; Benzing C; Krenzien F; Andreou A; Kamali C; Lenz K; Pratschke J; Schmelzle M
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Dec; 29(12):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 31670608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan.
    Tanaka S; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Aug; 225(2):249-258.e1. PubMed ID: 28408311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Utility of the Difficulty Scoring System for Predicting Surgical Time of Laparoscopic Liver Resection.
    Uchida H; Iwashita Y; Saga K; Takayama H; Watanabe K; Endo Y; Yada K; Ohta M; Inomata M
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Sep; 26(9):702-6. PubMed ID: 27352010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The preoperative M2BPGi score predicts operative difficulty and the incidence of postoperative complications in laparoscopic liver resection.
    Fuji T; Kojima T; Kajioka H; Sakamoto M; Oka R; Katayama T; Narahara Y; Niguma T
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1262-1273. PubMed ID: 36175698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.