139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35604717)
1. Radiation doses in the United Kingdom breast screening programmes 2016-2019.
Loveland J; Young KC; Oduko JM; Mackenzie A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 95(1135):20211400. PubMed ID: 35604717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY.
Lekatou A; Metaxas V; Messaris G; Antzele P; Tzavellas G; Panayiotakis G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):239-251. PubMed ID: 30753684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programmes 2019-2023.
Loveland J; Mackenzie A
Br J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 97(1156):787-793. PubMed ID: 38291906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
Asadollahzadeh N; Razavi S; Zare MH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Jun; 200(9):809-821. PubMed ID: 38811346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998.
Young KC; Burch A
Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):278-87. PubMed ID: 10817044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regression Analysis between the Different Breast Dose Quantities Reported in Digital Mammography and Patient Age, Breast Thickness, and Acquisition Parameters.
Dhou S; Dalah E; AlGhafeer R; Hamidu A; Obaideen A
J Imaging; 2022 Jul; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Establishment of regional diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in Western Province of Sri Lanka.
Niroshani HS; Jeyasugiththan J; Senanayake G; Negishi T
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 33271512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Setting Scottish diagnostic reference levels for mammography incorporating both craniocaudal and oblique projections between 30 and 80 mm.
Weir A; Schofield KA; McCurrach A
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 33684070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Cepeda Martins AR; Di Maria S; Afonso J; Pereira M; Pereira J; Vaz P
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 34565679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 2001 and 2002.
Young KC; Burch A; Oduko JM
Br J Radiol; 2005 Mar; 78(927):207-18. PubMed ID: 15730985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.
Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Correa RS; Peixoto JE; Almeida CD; Rodrigues DCN; Glassman LM; Soares LR
J Radiol Prot; 2019 Apr; 39(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 30812019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose management software implementation in mammography.
Samara ET; Tsapaki V; Sramek D
Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():88-95. PubMed ID: 31765886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glandular doses and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for Saudi breast cancer screening programme (2012-2021).
Albeshan SM; Alhulail AA; Almuqbil MM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Apr; 200(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 38324508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012.
Young KC; Oduko JM
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150831. PubMed ID: 26654386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between mean glandular dose and compressed breast thickness specified for Jordan.
Ahmed Shaker Hegian Z; Moh'd Abu Tahoun L; Ramli RM; Noor Azman NZ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Dec; 200(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 37738470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.
Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Poga V; Louizi A; Kottou S; Koulentianos E
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 18714130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposed DRLs for mammography in Switzerland.
Dupont L; Aberle C; Botsikas D; Ith M; Lima TVM; Menz R; Monnin P; Poletti PA; Presilla S; Schegerer A; Stoica LC; Trueb P; Sans Merce M
J Radiol Prot; 2024 May; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38530290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women.
Baek JE; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee HS
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 28153022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
