These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35604829)

  • 1. Longevity of Direct Resin Composite Restorations in Maxillary Anterior Crown Fractures: A 4-year Clinical Evaluation.
    Korkut B; Özcan M
    Oper Dent; 2022 Mar; 47(2):138-148. PubMed ID: 35604829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longevity of direct diastema closure and recontouring restorations with resin composites in maxillary anterior teeth: A 4-year clinical evaluation.
    Korkut B; Türkmen C
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Jun; 33(4):590-604. PubMed ID: 33354867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-year retrospective evaluation of monoshade universal composites in direct veneer and diastema closure restorations.
    Korkut B; Ünal T; Can E
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Apr; 35(3):525-537. PubMed ID: 36478098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.
    Heintze SD; Loguercio AD; Hanzen TA; Reis A; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e109-e135. PubMed ID: 35221127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and resin composite restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(6):369-78; discussion 379. PubMed ID: 16417833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: A randomized clinical trial.
    Skupien JA; Cenci MS; Opdam NJ; Kreulen CM; Huysmans MC; Pereira-Cenci T
    J Dent; 2016 May; 48():34-9. PubMed ID: 26976553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct resin composite restorations for fractured maxillary teeth and diastema closure: A 7 years retrospective evaluation of survival and influencing factors.
    Lempel E; Lovász BV; Meszarics R; Jeges S; Tóth Á; Szalma J
    Dent Mater; 2017 Apr; 33(4):467-476. PubMed ID: 28256273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 19504133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
    Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorative systems in posterior teeth.
    Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM; Hamama HH
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Aug; 10(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 18792703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis.
    Heintze SD; Rousson V
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):407-31. PubMed ID: 23082310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure.
    Demarco FF; Collares K; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Correa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1214-24. PubMed ID: 26303655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of Class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 25516885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.