These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35604891)

  • 1. Impact of measurement method on interobserver variability of apparent diffusion coefficient of lesions in prostate MRI.
    Takahashi H; Yoshida K; Kawashima A; Lee NJ; Froemming AT; Adamo DA; Khandelwal A; Bolan CW; Heller MT; Hartman RP; Kim B; Philbrick KA; Carter RE; Mynderse LA; Humphreys MR; Cai JC; Takahashi N
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268829. PubMed ID: 35604891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning.
    Priola AM; Priola SM; Parlatano D; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Giardino R; Ferrero B; Ardissone F; Veltri A
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1386-1394. PubMed ID: 27516357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.
    Bickel H; Pinker K; Polanec S; Magometschnigg H; Wengert G; Spick C; Bogner W; Bago-Horvath Z; Helbich TH; Baltzer P
    Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1883-1892. PubMed ID: 27578047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A preliminary study of the effect of region of interest on ADC values and interobserver variability.
    Ma C; Liu L; Li J; Wang L; Chen LG; Zhang Y; Chen SY; Lu JP
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 26182908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diffusion-weighted quantitative MRI of pleural abnormalities: Intra- and interobserver variability in the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.
    Priola AM; Priola SM; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Brundu M; Righi L; Veltri A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):769-782. PubMed ID: 28117923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of Prostate Cancer: Comparison of 2D and 3D ROIs.
    Tamada T; Huang C; Ream JM; Taffel M; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):113-117. PubMed ID: 29045185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability.
    Nogueira L; Brandão S; Matos E; Nunes RG; Ferreira HA; Loureiro J; Ramos I
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 25698095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients with Testicular Tumors-Intra- and Interobserver Variability.
    Pedersen MRV; Loft MK; Dam C; Rasmussen LÆL; Timm S
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):837-847. PubMed ID: 35200570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of testicular germ cell neoplasms: Effect of ROI methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values and interobserver variability.
    Tsili AC; Ntorkou A; Astrakas L; Xydis V; Tsampalas S; Sofikitis N; Argyropoulou MI
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():1-6. PubMed ID: 28267523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
    Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method.
    Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Shi HB; Wu FY
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 27587953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interobserver variability of selective region-of-interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses: Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements.
    Ahlawat S; Khandheria P; Del Grande F; Morelli J; Subhawong TK; Demehri S; Fayad LM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):446-54. PubMed ID: 26174705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of region of interest on ADC and interobserver variability in thyroid nodules.
    Zhou X; Ma C; Wang Z; Liu JL; Rui YP; Li YH; Peng YF
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Jul; 19(1):55. PubMed ID: 31299927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in ovarian tumor: Effect of region-of-interest methods on ADC values and diagnostic ability.
    Mukuda N; Fujii S; Inoue C; Fukunaga T; Tanabe Y; Itamochi H; Ogawa T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):720-5. PubMed ID: 26201495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging.
    Giannotti E; Waugh S; Priba L; Davis Z; Crowe E; Vinnicombe S
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26078100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a systematic bias of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of the breast if measured on different workstations? An inter- and intra-reader agreement study.
    Clauser P; Marcon M; Maieron M; Zuiani C; Bazzocchi M; Baltzer PA
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2291-6. PubMed ID: 26443604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of Index Lesion Size and Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Measured by Prostate Multiparametric MRI: Correlation With Whole-Mount Sectioning of Specimens.
    Diaz de Leon A; Leyendecker JR; Otero-Muinelo S; Grewal H; Xi Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I; Costa DN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):783-788. PubMed ID: 30160988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability.
    Lambregts DM; Beets GL; Maas M; Curvo-Semedo L; Kessels AG; Thywissen T; Beets-Tan RG
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Dec; 21(12):2567-74. PubMed ID: 21822946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do the variations in ROI placement technique have influence for prostate ADC measurements?
    Ueno Y; Tamada T; Sofue K; Urase Y; Hinata N; Fujisawa M; Murakami T
    Acta Radiol Open; 2022 Mar; 11(3):20584601221086500. PubMed ID: 35368407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Histological Characterization of Rectal Cancer: Impact of Different Region-of-Interest Positioning Protocols on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements.
    Peng Y; Xu C; Hu X; Shen Y; Hu D; Kamel I; Li Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():109028. PubMed ID: 32361587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.