These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35605150)

  • 1. Impact of artificial intelligence on colorectal polyp detection for early-career endoscopists: an international comparative study.
    Ainechi D; Misawa M; Barua I; Larsen SLV; Paulsen V; Garborg KK; Aabakken L; Tønnesen CJ; Løberg M; Kalager M; Kudo SE; Hotta K; Ohtsuka K; Saito S; Ikematsu H; Saito Y; Matsuda T; Itoh H; Mori K; Bretthauer M; Mori Y
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 Oct; 57(10):1272-1277. PubMed ID: 35605150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
    Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy improves adenoma detection rates even in experienced endoscopists: a cohort study in Singapore.
    Koh FH; Ladlad J; ; Teo EK; Lin CL; Foo FJ
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 35882667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopists performance in optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps in artificial intelligence studies.
    Pecere S; Antonelli G; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Mori Y; Hassan C; Fuccio L; Bisschops R; Costamagna G; Jin EH; Lee D; Misawa M; Messmann H; Iacopini F; Petruzziello L; Repici A; Saito Y; Sharma P; Yamada M; Spada C; Frazzoni L
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2022 Oct; 10(8):817-826. PubMed ID: 35984903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One-year review of real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy performance.
    Chin SE; Wan FT; Ladlad J; Chue KM; ; Teo EK; Lin CL; Foo FJ; Koh FH
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6402-6407. PubMed ID: 36932187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided automated diminutive colonic polyp detection in colonoscopy by using deep machine learning system; first indigenous algorithm developed in India.
    Mazumdar S; Sinha S; Jha S; Jagtap B
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Apr; 42(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 37145230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of artificial intelligence for detection of subtle and advanced colorectal neoplasia.
    Ahmad OF; González-Bueno Puyal J; Brandao P; Kader R; Abbasi F; Hussein M; Haidry RJ; Toth D; Mountney P; Seward E; Vega R; Stoyanov D; Lovat LB
    Dig Endosc; 2022 May; 34(4):862-869. PubMed ID: 34748665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated polyp detection in the colorectum: a prospective study (with videos).
    Klare P; Sander C; Prinzen M; Haller B; Nowack S; Abdelhafez M; Poszler A; Brown H; Wilhelm D; Schmid RM; von Delius S; Wittenberg T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):576-582.e1. PubMed ID: 30342029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials.
    Repici A; Spadaccini M; Antonelli G; Correale L; Maselli R; Galtieri PA; Pellegatta G; Capogreco A; Milluzzo SM; Lollo G; Di Paolo D; Badalamenti M; Ferrara E; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Anderloni A; Rondonotti E; Amato A; De Gottardi A; Spada C; Radaelli F; Savevski V; Wallace MB; Sharma P; Rösch T; Hassan C
    Gut; 2022 Apr; 71(4):757-765. PubMed ID: 34187845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artificial Intelligence Allows Leaving-In-Situ Colorectal Polyps.
    Hassan C; Balsamo G; Lorenzetti R; Zullo A; Antonelli G
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 20(11):2505-2513.e4. PubMed ID: 35835342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatio-Temporal Feature Transformation Based Polyp Recognition for Automatic Detection: Higher Accuracy than Novice Endoscopists in Colorectal Polyp Detection and Diagnosis.
    Xu J; Kuai Y; Chen Q; Wang X; Zhao Y; Sun B
    Dig Dis Sci; 2024 Mar; 69(3):911-921. PubMed ID: 38244123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of a Deep-learning Polyp Detection System in Prospectively Collected Colonoscopy Videos With Variable Bowel Preparation Quality.
    Becq A; Chandnani M; Bharadwaj S; Baran B; Ernest-Suarez K; Gabr M; Glissen-Brown J; Sawhney M; Pleskow DK; Berzin TM
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 54(6):554-557. PubMed ID: 31789758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a real-time artificial intelligence-based polyp detection system: a US multi-center pilot study.
    Quan SY; Wei MT; Lee J; Mohi-Ud-Din R; Mostaghim R; Sachdev R; Siegel D; Friedlander Y; Friedland S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6598. PubMed ID: 35449442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sizing of Polyp Illustrations Differs by Endoscopists' Gender and Improves With a Measurement Reference.
    Shamsi N; Shaukat A; Halperin-Goldstein S; Colton J
    Eval Health Prof; 2020 Dec; 43(4):270-273. PubMed ID: 30929453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colorectal polyp characterization with standard endoscopy: Will Artificial Intelligence succeed where human eyes failed?
    Parsa N; Rex DK; Byrne MF
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2021; 52-53():101736. PubMed ID: 34172255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is artificial intelligence the final answer to missed polyps in colonoscopy?
    Lui TKL; Leung WK
    World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 26(35):5248-5255. PubMed ID: 32994685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
    IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of sessile serrated adenoma using artificial intelligence-enhanced endoscopy: an Asian perspective.
    Soo JM; Koh FH
    ANZ J Surg; 2024 Mar; 94(3):362-365. PubMed ID: 38149749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.