These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35605942)

  • 1. Comparison of the Susceptibility to Implant Failure in the Lateral, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Oikawa R; Murakami H; Endo H; Yan H; Yamabe D; Chiba Y; Oikawa R; Nishida N; Chen X; Sakai T; Doita M
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e835-e843. PubMed ID: 35605942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
    Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite Element Modeling for Biomechanical Comparisons of Multilevel Transforaminal, Posterior, and Lateral Lumbar Approaches to Interbody Fusion Augmented with Posterior Instrumentation.
    Shimooki Y; Murakami H; Nishida N; Yan H; Oikawa R; Hirooki E; Yamabe D; Chiba Y; Sakai T; Doita M
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Feb; 182():e463-e470. PubMed ID: 38042291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Approach Significantly Affect Adjacent Segment Mobility?
    Wangsawatwong P; Sawa AGU; Pereira BA; Lehrman JN; Turner JD; Uribe JS; Kelly BP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Nov; 46(21):E1119-E1124. PubMed ID: 34618704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis.
    Xu H; Tang H; Guan X; Jiang F; Xu N; Ju W; Zhu X; Zhang X; Zhang Q; Li M
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Mar; 72(1 Suppl Operative):21-6. PubMed ID: 23037820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e81-e88. PubMed ID: 33647495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion after decompressive surgery--a finite element analysis.
    Chen SH; Lin SC; Tsai WC; Wang CW; Chao SH
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 May; 13():72. PubMed ID: 22591664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of modified and traditional cortical bone trajectory technique on adjacent segment degeneration in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-finite element analysis.
    Tuoheti A; Xiao Y; Wang Y; Maimaiti A; Zhang R; Kahaer A; Tuoheti A; Wu X; Rexiti P
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Jan; 25(1):7. PubMed ID: 38166794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical Evaluation of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Various Fixation Options for Adjacent Segment Degeneration: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Lee HJ; Lee SJ; Jung JM; Lee TH; Jeong C; Lee TJ; Jang JE; Lee JW
    World Neurosurg; 2023 May; 173():e156-e167. PubMed ID: 36775239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis. Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration.
    Tang S
    Saudi Med J; 2015 Aug; 36(8):993-6. PubMed ID: 26219453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the influence of three different lumbar interbody fusion approaches on stress in the pedicle screw fixation system: Finite element static and vibration analyses.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 Mar; 35(3):e3162. PubMed ID: 30294902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical analysis of Instrumented decompression and Interbody fusion procedures in Lumbar spine: a finite element analysis study.
    Saini S; Moger NM; Kumar M; Sarkar S; Mittal S; Ifthekar S; Ahuja K; Singh IV; Kandwal P
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Jul; 61(7):1875-1886. PubMed ID: 36971956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with 1 or 2 cages by finite-element analysis.
    Xu H; Ju W; Xu N; Zhang X; Zhu X; Zhu L; Qian X; Wen F; Wu W; Jiang F
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Dec; 73(2 Suppl Operative):ons198-205; discussion ons205. PubMed ID: 23632763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the In Situ Screw Implantation Region and Angle on the Stability of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study.
    Zhu G; Wu Z; Fang Z; Zhang P; He J; Yu X; Ge Z; Tang K; Liang D; Jiang X; Liang Z; Cui J
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Jul; 14(7):1506-1517. PubMed ID: 35656700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.