These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3560877)

  • 1. Variation of lumbar spine stiffness with load.
    Edwards WT; Hayes WC; Posner I; White AA; Mann RW
    J Biomech Eng; 1987 Feb; 109(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 3560877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultimate strength of the lumbar spine in flexion--an in vitro study.
    Osvalder AL; Neumann P; Lövsund P; Nordwall A
    J Biomech; 1990; 23(5):453-60. PubMed ID: 2373719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intervertebral disc degeneration alters lumbar spine segmental stiffness in all modes of loading under a compressive follower load.
    Zirbel SA; Stolworthy DK; Howell LL; Bowden AE
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1134-47. PubMed ID: 23507531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for studying the biomechanical load response of the (in vitro) lumbar spine under dynamic flexion-shear loads.
    Osvalder AL; Neumann P; Lövsund P; Nordwall A
    J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1227-36. PubMed ID: 8253827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the torsional stiffness of the lumbar spine in flexion and extension.
    Garges KJ; Nourbakhsh A; Morris R; Yang J; Mody M; Patterson R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Oct; 31(8):563-9. PubMed ID: 18984238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calibration of hyperelastic material properties of the human lumbar intervertebral disc under fast dynamic compressive loads.
    Wagnac E; Arnoux PJ; Garo A; El-Rich M; Aubin CE
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Oct; 133(10):101007. PubMed ID: 22070332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can extra-articular strains be used to measure facet contact forces in the lumbar spine? An in-vitro biomechanical study.
    Zhu QA; Park YB; Sjovold SG; Niosi CA; Wilson DC; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Feb; 222(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 18441753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dynamic flexion/extension properties of the lumbar spine in vitro using a novel pendulum system.
    Crisco JJ; Fujita L; Spenciner DB
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2767-73. PubMed ID: 17367798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and validation of a novel Cartesian biomechanical testing system with coordinated 6DOF real-time load control: application to the lumbar spine (L1-S, L4-L5).
    Kelly BP; Bennett CR
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1948-54. PubMed ID: 23764173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sagittal rotational stiffness and damping increase in a porcine lumbar spine with increased or prolonged loading.
    Zondervan RL; Popovich JM; Radcliffe CJ; Pathak PK; Reeves NP
    J Biomech; 2016 Feb; 49(4):624-7. PubMed ID: 26892899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of external trunk loads on lumbar spine stability.
    Cholewicki J; Simons AP; Radebold A
    J Biomech; 2000 Nov; 33(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 10940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element.
    Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 16321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variations of stiffness and strength along the human cervical spine.
    Shea M; Edwards WT; White AA; Hayes WC
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 2037617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of inter-individual lumbar spine geometry variation on load-sharing: Geometrically personalized Finite Element study.
    Naserkhaki S; Jaremko JL; El-Rich M
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2909-2917. PubMed ID: 27448498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 1990 Volvo Award in experimental studies. The dependence of intervertebral disc mechanical properties on physiologic conditions.
    Keller TS; Holm SH; Hansson TH; Spengler DM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1990 Aug; 15(8):751-61. PubMed ID: 2237625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the restoring force method for identification of lumbar spine flexion-extension motion under flexion-extension moment.
    Borkowski SL; Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Masri SF
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24556960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
    O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ultimate flexural strength of the lumbar spine and vertebral bone mineral content.
    Neumann P; Osvalder AL; Nordwall A; Lövsund P; Hansson T
    J Spinal Disord; 1993 Aug; 6(4):314-23. PubMed ID: 8219545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].
    Reinhold M; Schmölz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
    Unfallchirurg; 2007 Apr; 110(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 17211598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of preload on load displacement curves of the lumbar spine.
    Panjabi MM; Krag MH; White AA; Southwick WO
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1977 Jan; 8(1):181-92. PubMed ID: 857225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.