These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3560891)

  • 21. Assessing growth of loudness in children by cross-modality matching.
    Serpanos YC; Gravel JS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):190-202. PubMed ID: 10783922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the relations of intensity jnd's to loudness and neural noise.
    Zwislocki JJ; Jordan HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 3958318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Basilar membrane nonlinearity and loudness.
    Schlauch RS; DiGiovanni JJ; Ries DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2010-20. PubMed ID: 9566323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 188(1-2):70-88. PubMed ID: 14759572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of signal duration on categorical loudness scaling in normal and in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Garnier S; Micheyl C; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L
    Audiology; 1999; 38(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 10431905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Loudness scaling. A procedure for quantitative recruitment detection].
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Wagner I
    HNO; 1994 Jun; 42(6):350-7. PubMed ID: 8071095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of auditory nonlinearity for listeners with different hearing losses using temporal masking and categorical loudness scaling.
    Jürgens T; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):177-91. PubMed ID: 21669269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preferred overall loudness. I: Sound field presentation in the laboratory.
    Smeds K; Keidser G; Zakis J; Dillon H; Leijon A; Grant F; Convery E; Brew C
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jan; 45(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 16562559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain.
    Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 2013 Jan; 295():172-9. PubMed ID: 22641191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection of pure-tone amplitude modulation as a function of sensation level from 8 to 14 kHz.
    Long GR; Cullen JK
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 3771378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On loudness at threshold.
    Buus S; Müsch H; Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):399-410. PubMed ID: 9670532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Temporal analysis and stimulus fluctuation in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Buss E; Hatch DR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 41(2):340-54. PubMed ID: 9570587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The determination of tinnitus loudness considering the effects of recruitment.
    Tyler RS; Conrad-Armes D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 6865383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Testing the Central Gain Model: Loudness Growth Correlates with Central Auditory Gain Enhancement in a Rodent Model of Hyperacusis.
    Auerbach BD; Radziwon K; Salvi R
    Neuroscience; 2019 May; 407():93-107. PubMed ID: 30292765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relation between the growth of loudness and high-frequency excitation.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2655-63. PubMed ID: 7983271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intensity discrimination and increment detection in cochlear-implant users.
    Wojtczak M; Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):396-407. PubMed ID: 12880051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Objective estimation of loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Silva I; Epstein M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):353-62. PubMed ID: 22280597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of normal and impaired hearing. I. Loudness, localization.
    Scharf B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):49-79. PubMed ID: 292154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory intensity discrimination as a function of level-rove and tone duration in normal-hearing and impaired subjects: the "mid-level hump" revisited.
    Pienkowski M; Hagerman B
    Hear Res; 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):107-15. PubMed ID: 19345257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.