These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35609424)
1. Understanding the differences in wear testing method standards for total knee replacement. Abdelgaied A; Fisher J; Jennings LM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Aug; 132():105258. PubMed ID: 35609424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of surgical alignment and soft tissue conditions on the kinematics and wear of a fixed bearing total knee replacement. Johnston H; Abdelgaied A; Pandit H; Fisher J; Jennings LM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103386. PubMed ID: 31408775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinematic evaluation of cruciate-retaining total knee replacement patients during level walking: a comparison with the displacement-controlled ISO standard. Ngai V; Wimmer MA J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2363-8. PubMed ID: 19651410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of in vitro wear of machined and molded UHMWPE tibial inserts on TKR kinematics. Benson LC; DesJardins JD; LaBerge M J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(5):496-504. PubMed ID: 11505423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Representing the effect of variation in soft tissue constraints in experimental simulation of total knee replacements. Johnston H; Abdelgaied A; Pandit H; Fisher J; Jennings LM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():87-94. PubMed ID: 30053734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of variations in input directions according to ISO 14243 on wearing of knee prostheses. Wang XH; Zhang W; Song DY; Li H; Dong X; Zhang M; Zhao F; Jin ZM; Cheng CK PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206496. PubMed ID: 30372460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive combined experimental and computational framework for pre-clinical wear simulation of total knee replacements. Abdelgaied A; Fisher J; Jennings LM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Feb; 78():282-291. PubMed ID: 29195220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In-vivo kinematics of knee prostheses patients during level walking compared with the ISO force-controlled simulator standard. Ngai V; Schwenke T; Wimmer MA Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Oct; 223(7):889-96. PubMed ID: 19908427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Kinematic Alignment Increase Polyethylene Wear Compared With Mechanically Aligned Components? A Wear Simulation Study. Schroeder S; Schonhoff M; Uhler M; Braun S; Jaeger S; Renkawitz T; Kretzer JP Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Sep; 480(9):1790-1800. PubMed ID: 35583549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of total knee replacement wear to variability in motion and load input: A parametric finite element analysis study. Mell SP; Wimmer MA; Lundberg HJ J Orthop Res; 2020 Jul; 38(7):1538-1549. PubMed ID: 32458460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3. Mell SP; Wimmer MA; Lundberg HJ J Biomech; 2019 May; 88():104-112. PubMed ID: 30940359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The wear and kinematics of two medially stabilised total knee replacement systems. Cowie RM; Cullum CJ; Collins SN; Jennings LM Knee; 2024 Mar; 47():160-170. PubMed ID: 38394995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of simulator input conditions on the wear of total knee replacements: An experimental and computational study. Brockett CL; Abdelgaied A; Haythornthwaite T; Hardaker C; Fisher J; Jennings LM Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 May; 230(5):429-39. PubMed ID: 27160561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ISO 14243-1 to ASTM F3141 in terms of wearing of knee prostheses. Wang XH; Li H; Dong X; Zhao F; Cheng CK Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2019 Mar; 63():34-40. PubMed ID: 30802769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biotribology of a mobile bearing posterior stabilised knee design--effect of motion restraint on wear, tibio-femoral kinematics and particles. Grupp TM; Schroeder C; Kyun Kim T; Miehlke RK; Fritz B; Jansson V; Utzschneider S J Biomech; 2014 Jul; 47(10):2415-23. PubMed ID: 24837220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of insert conformity and material on total knee replacement wear. Abdelgaied A; Brockett CL; Liu F; Jennings LM; Jin Z; Fisher J Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Jan; 228(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 24297773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ISO standard and TKR patient axial force profiles during the stance phase of gait. Lundberg HJ; Ngai V; Wimmer MA Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Mar; 226(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 22558837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total knee replacement wear during simulated gait with mechanical and anatomic alignments. Maag C; Cracaoanu I; Langhorn J; Heldreth M Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 May; 235(5):515-522. PubMed ID: 33522419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tibiofemoral conformity variation offers changed kinematics and wear performance of customized posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Koh YG; Son J; Kwon OR; Kwon SK; Kang KT Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1213-1223. PubMed ID: 29974167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insert conformity variation affects kinematics and wear performance of total knee replacements. Zhang Q; Chen Z; Zhang J; Hu J; Peng Y; Fan X; Jin Z Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2019 May; 65():19-25. PubMed ID: 30953916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]