186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35610281)
1. Surrogate vascular input function measurements from the superior sagittal sinus are repeatable and provide tissue-validated kinetic parameters in brain DCE-MRI.
Lewis D; Zhu X; Coope DJ; Zhao S; King AT; Cootes T; Jackson A; Li KL
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8737. PubMed ID: 35610281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robust arterial input function surrogate measurement from the superior sagittal sinus complex signal for fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the brain.
Bourassa-Moreau B; Lebel R; Gilbert G; Mathieu D; Lepage M
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Dec; 86(6):3052-3066. PubMed ID: 34268824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of individual and population-derived vascular input functions for quantitative DCE-MRI in rats.
Hormuth DA; Skinner JT; Does MD; Yankeelov TE
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 24556502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of the gadolinium concentration measurements and of the fitting parameters of the vascular input function in the superior sagittal sinus in a patient population.
Lavini C; Verhoeff JJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Dec; 28(10):1420-30. PubMed ID: 20817379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The LEGATOS technique: A new tissue-validated dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI method for whole-brain, high-spatial resolution parametric mapping.
Li KL; Lewis D; Coope DJ; Roncaroli F; Agushi E; Pathmanaban ON; King AT; Zhao S; Jackson A; Cootes T; Zhu X
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Oct; 86(4):2122-2136. PubMed ID: 33991126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-dose GBCA administration for brain tumour dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: a feasibility study.
Lewis D; Li KL; Waqar M; Coope DJ; Pathmanaban ON; King AT; Djoukhadar I; Zhao S; Cootes TF; Jackson A; Zhu X
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4905. PubMed ID: 38418818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI of High Grade Brain Gliomas Obtained with Arterial or Venous Waveform Input Function.
Filice S; Crisi G
J Neuroimaging; 2016; 26(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 25923172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phase-based vascular input function: Improved quantitative DCE-MRI of atherosclerotic plaques.
van Hoof RH; Hermeling E; Truijman MT; van Oostenbrugge RJ; Daemen JW; van der Geest RJ; van Orshoven NP; Schreuder AH; Backes WH; Daemen MJ; Wildberger JE; Kooi ME
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4619-28. PubMed ID: 26233189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of tumor perfusion kinetics from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in glioblastoma.
Woodall RT; Sahoo P; Cui Y; Chen BT; Shiroishi MS; Lavini C; Frankel P; Gutova M; Brown CE; Munson JM; Rockne RC
Neurooncol Adv; 2021; 3(1):vdab174. PubMed ID: 34988454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Mehrabian H; Chandrana C; Pang I; Chopra R; Martel AL
Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1735-47. PubMed ID: 22752523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selection of Fitting Model and Arterial Input Function for Repeatability in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Prostate MRI.
Peled S; Vangel M; Kikinis R; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM; Fedorov A
Acad Radiol; 2019 Sep; 26(9):e241-e251. PubMed ID: 30467073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vascular input function correction of inflow enhancement for improved pharmacokinetic modeling of liver DCE-MRI.
Ning J; Schubert T; Johnson KM; Roldán-Alzate A; Chen H; Yuan C; Reeder SB
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jun; 79(6):3093-3102. PubMed ID: 29124781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm.
Ng CS; Wei W; Bankson JA; Ravoori MK; Han L; Brammer DW; Klumpp S; Waterton JC; Jackson EF
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130168. PubMed ID: 26208254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of contrast agent bolus arrival delays for improved reproducibility of liver DCE MRI.
Chouhan MD; Bainbridge A; Atkinson D; Punwani S; Mookerjee RP; Lythgoe MF; Taylor SA
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(19):6905-6918. PubMed ID: 27618594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-input tracer kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in thoracic malignancies.
Lee SH; Rimner A; Deasy JO; Hunt MA; Tyagi N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):169-188. PubMed ID: 31602789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voxelwise comparison of perfusion parameters estimated using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) computed tomography and DCE-magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kallehauge J; Nielsen T; Haack S; Peters DA; Mohamed S; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Hansen DC; Rasmussen F; Tanderup K; Pedersen EM
Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 24003852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
