These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Effects of papillary muscle position on in-vitro dynamic strain on the porcine mitral valve. He Z; Sacks MS; Baijens L; Wanant S; Shah P; Yoganathan AP J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jul; 12(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 12918852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dynamic behavior of prosthetic aortic tissue valves as viewed by high-speed cinematography. Rainer WG; Christopher RA; Sadler TR; Hilgenberg AD Ann Thorac Surg; 1979 Sep; 28(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 485628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position. Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Numerical analysis on the hemodynamics and leaflet dynamics in a bileaflet mechanical heart valve using a fluid-structure interaction method. Choi CR; Kim CN ASAIO J; 2009; 55(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 19730001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An optimal mounting frame to reduce flexural stresses of bioprosthetic heart valves. Vesely I; Krucinski S; Dokainish MA; Campbell G ASAIO J; 1994; 40(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 8003759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro study of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: selection of a tissue valve. Flecher EM; Curry JW; Joudinaud TM; Saber H; MacNett J; Ahlin A; Weber PA; Duran CM J Card Surg; 2008; 23(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 18435638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An experimentally derived stress resultant shell model for heart valve dynamic simulations. Kim H; Chandran KB; Sacks MS; Lu J Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 17089074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro. Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration. Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves using a CFD/FSI model. Dumont K; Vierendeels J; Kaminsky R; van Nooten G; Verdonck P; Bluestein D J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):558-65. PubMed ID: 17655477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Open versus closed position fixation of bioprosthesis. Comparative in vitro studies from the viewpoint of durability. Imamura E; Ohteki H; Tsutsui T; Nishiya Y; Ishihara S; Koyanagi H J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Apr; 83(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 7062772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]