These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3561030)

  • 21. Numerical simulation of opening process in a bileaflet mechanical heart valve under pulsatile flow condition.
    Shi Y; Zhao Y; Yeo TJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 12701798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design and manufacture of a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) cryogel tri-leaflet heart valve prosthesis.
    Jiang H; Campbell G; Boughner D; Wan WK; Quantz M
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 May; 26(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 15121052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Papillary muscle force distribution after total tricuspid reconstruction using porcine extracellular matrix: in-vitro valve characterization.
    Ropcke DM; Jensen MO; Jensen H; Hejslet T; Nielsen SL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Nov; 23(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 25790629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Non-destructive evaluation techniques for prosthetic heart valves based on hologram interferometry. Part II: Experimental results and clinical implications.
    Geiger AW; Zarubin AM; Fahrenkamp A; Konertz W; von Bally G; Scheld HH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Jul; 2(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 8269148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Opening and closing kinematics of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 134(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 17723814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamic simulation pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve function.
    Kim H; Lu J; Sacks MS; Chandran KB
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):717-24. PubMed ID: 16995758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of papillary muscle position on in-vitro dynamic strain on the porcine mitral valve.
    He Z; Sacks MS; Baijens L; Wanant S; Shah P; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jul; 12(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 12918852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic behavior of prosthetic aortic tissue valves as viewed by high-speed cinematography.
    Rainer WG; Christopher RA; Sadler TR; Hilgenberg AD
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1979 Sep; 28(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 485628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Numerical analysis on the hemodynamics and leaflet dynamics in a bileaflet mechanical heart valve using a fluid-structure interaction method.
    Choi CR; Kim CN
    ASAIO J; 2009; 55(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 19730001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hydrodynamic performance of the Medtronic Freestyle Aortic Root Bioprosthesis.
    Yoganathan AP; Eberhardt CE; Walker PG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Sep; 3(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 8000594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An optimal mounting frame to reduce flexural stresses of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Vesely I; Krucinski S; Dokainish MA; Campbell G
    ASAIO J; 1994; 40(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 8003759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro study of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: selection of a tissue valve.
    Flecher EM; Curry JW; Joudinaud TM; Saber H; MacNett J; Ahlin A; Weber PA; Duran CM
    J Card Surg; 2008; 23(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 18435638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An experimentally derived stress resultant shell model for heart valve dynamic simulations.
    Kim H; Chandran KB; Sacks MS; Lu J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 17089074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves using a CFD/FSI model.
    Dumont K; Vierendeels J; Kaminsky R; van Nooten G; Verdonck P; Bluestein D
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):558-65. PubMed ID: 17655477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Open versus closed position fixation of bioprosthesis. Comparative in vitro studies from the viewpoint of durability.
    Imamura E; Ohteki H; Tsutsui T; Nishiya Y; Ishihara S; Koyanagi H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Apr; 83(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 7062772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional coupled fluid-structure simulation of pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve function.
    Makhijani VB; Yang HQ; Dionne PJ; Thubrikar MJ
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M387-92. PubMed ID: 9360067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of the design and dynamics of aortic bioprostheses in vivo.
    Thubrikar M; Skinner JR; Aouad J; Finkelmeier BA; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Aug; 84(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 7098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.