These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35610415)

  • 1. Interactions among endogenous, exogenous, and agency-driven attentional selection mechanisms in interactive displays.
    Vilanova-Goldstein AC; Huffman G; Brockmole JR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1477-1488. PubMed ID: 35610415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation.
    Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mixed signals: The effect of conflicting reward- and goal-driven biases on selective attention.
    Preciado D; Munneke J; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1297-1310. PubMed ID: 28439793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional selection is biased towards controllable stimuli.
    Huffman G; Brockmole JR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2558-2569. PubMed ID: 32166643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An EEG study of the combined effects of top-down and bottom-up attentional selection under varying task difficulty.
    Rashal E; Senoussi M; Santandrea E; Ben-Hamed S; Macaluso E; Chelazzi L; Boehler CN
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jun; 59(6):e14002. PubMed ID: 35060631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
    Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional resource allocation during a cued saccade task.
    Huddleston WE; Aleksandrowicz MS; Yufa A; Knurr CR; Lytle JR; Puissant MM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 23792667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond one's body parts: Remote object movement with sense of agency involuntarily biases spatial attention.
    Nakashima R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):576-582. PubMed ID: 30484082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hide and seek: Directing top-down attention is not sufficient for accelerating conscious access.
    Gayet S; Douw I; van der Burg V; Van der Stigchel S; Paffen CLE
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():235-252. PubMed ID: 30274667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. I. Effects of behavioral context.
    Bowman EM; Brown VJ; Kertzman C; Schwarz U; Robinson DL
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):431-43. PubMed ID: 8360720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Both dorsal and ventral attention network nodes are implicated in exogenously driven visuospatial anticipation.
    Ahrens MM; Veniero D; Freund IM; Harvey M; Thut G
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():168-181. PubMed ID: 30981955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Was that a threat? Attentional biases by signals of threat.
    Preciado D; Munneke J; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2017 Apr; 17(3):478-486. PubMed ID: 27819442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top-down matching singleton cues have no edge over top-down matching nonsingletons in spatial cueing.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):241-249. PubMed ID: 29959614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Role of Color in Search Templates for Real-world Target Objects.
    Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 28(11):1714-1727. PubMed ID: 27315273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1252-68. PubMed ID: 16502846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.