BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35610541)

  • 21. The Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Stapling Devices During Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Comparison.
    Holzmacher JL; Luka S; Aziz M; Amdur RL; Agarwal S; Obias V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Feb; 27(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 27893300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Propensity score-matched analysis comparing laparoscopic to robotic surgery for colorectal cancer shows comparable clinical and oncological outcomes.
    Fleming CA; Ullah MF; Chang KH; McNamara E; Condon E; Waldron D; Coffey JC; Peirce CB
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Jun; 15(3):389-396. PubMed ID: 32643095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
    Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surgical outcomes and cost analysis of a multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery caseload in the Australian public health system.
    Steffens D; McBride KE; Hirst N; Solomon MJ; Anderson T; Thanigasalam R; Leslie S; Karunaratne S; Bannon PG
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2237-2245. PubMed ID: 37289337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Technical feasibility of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced colorectal cancer invading the urinary bladder.
    Liao YT; Huang J; Chen TC; Hung JS; Liang JT
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Nov; 26(11):905-914. PubMed ID: 35987827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Operative time and length of stay is similar between robotic assisted and laparoscopic colon and rectal resections.
    Nolan HR; Smith BE; Honaker MD
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):659-664. PubMed ID: 29594757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.
    Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2206-2216. PubMed ID: 30334160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feasibility of robotic multivisceral resections in colorectal cancer patients: a NSQIP-based study.
    Radomski SN; Chen SY; Done JZ; Stem M; Safar B; Efron JE; Atallah C
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2929-2936. PubMed ID: 37837599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in obese patients: a case-matched series.
    Harr JN; Luka S; Kankaria A; Juo YY; Agarwal S; Obias V
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2813-2819. PubMed ID: 27796599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Appraisal and Current Considerations of Robotics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.
    Andolfi C; Umanskiy K
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 30325690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.
    Tekkis PP; Senagore AJ; Delaney CP; Fazio VW
    Ann Surg; 2005 Jul; 242(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 15973105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Right colectomy: consecutive 100 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique for malignancy. Cumulative experience in a single centre.
    Mégevand JL; Amboldi M; Lillo E; Lenisa L; Ganio E; Ambrosi A; Rusconi A
    Updates Surg; 2019 Mar; 71(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 30448923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic review of the literature.
    Papanikolaou IG
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Dec; 24(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 25054567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer].
    Zhang H; Yuan W; Zhou Q; Gu X; Wang F
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 May; 20(5):540-544. PubMed ID: 28534332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of robotic colorectal resections for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review.
    Renshaw S; Silva IL; Hotouras A; Wexner SD; Murphy J; Bhan C
    Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Mar; 22(3):161-177. PubMed ID: 29546470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.
    Gorgun E; Ozben V; Costedio M; Stocchi L; Kalady M; Remzi F
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 27154266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study.
    Myrseth E; Nymo LS; Gjessing PF; Kørner H; Kvaløy JT; Norderval S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3574-3584. PubMed ID: 34406469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.