These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35612079)
41. Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Environment: Utilizing OMOP-CDM and OHDSI Software Stack to Integrate EHR Data. Dimitriadis VK; Gavriilidis GI; Natsiavas P Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():555-559. PubMed ID: 34042637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A Comparative Assessment of Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership and Mini-Sentinel Common Data Models and Analytics: Implications for Active Drug Safety Surveillance. Xu Y; Zhou X; Suehs BT; Hartzema AG; Kahn MG; Moride Y; Sauer BC; Liu Q; Moll K; Pasquale MK; Nair VP; Bate A Drug Saf; 2015 Aug; 38(8):749-65. PubMed ID: 26055920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Transformation of Pathology Reports Into the Common Data Model With Oncology Module: Use Case for Colon Cancer. Ryu B; Yoon E; Kim S; Lee S; Baek H; Yi S; Na HY; Kim JW; Baek RM; Hwang H; Yoo S J Med Internet Res; 2020 Dec; 22(12):e18526. PubMed ID: 33295294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. European Health Data & Evidence Network-learnings from building out a standardized international health data network. Voss EA; Blacketer C; van Sandijk S; Moinat M; Kallfelz M; van Speybroeck M; Prieto-Alhambra D; Schuemie MJ; Rijnbeek PR J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2023 Dec; 31(1):209-219. PubMed ID: 37952118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An ETL-process design for data harmonization to participate in international research with German real-world data based on FHIR and OMOP CDM. Peng Y; Henke E; Reinecke I; Zoch M; Sedlmayr M; Bathelt F Int J Med Inform; 2023 Jan; 169():104925. PubMed ID: 36395615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Integrating real-world data to assess cardiac ablation device outcomes in a multicenter study using the OMOP common data model for regulatory decisions: implementation and evaluation. Yu Y; Jiang G; Brandt E; Forsyth T; Dhruva SS; Zhang S; Chen J; Noseworthy PA; Doshi AA; Collison-Farr K; Kim D; Ross JS; Coplan PM; Drozda JP JAMIA Open; 2023 Apr; 6(1):ooac108. PubMed ID: 36632328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Conversion of National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) Database into Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM). You SC; Lee S; Cho SY; Park H; Jung S; Cho J; Yoon D; Park RW Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():467-470. PubMed ID: 29295138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Converting OMOP CDM to phenopackets: A model alignment and patient data representation evaluation. Schiffer-Kane K; Liu C; Callahan TJ; Ta C; Nestor JG; Weng C J Biomed Inform; 2024 Jul; 155():104659. PubMed ID: 38777085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. MI-Common Data Model: Extending Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM) for Registering Medical Imaging Metadata and Subsequent Curation Processes. Kalokyri V; Kondylakis H; Sfakianakis S; Nikiforaki K; Karatzanis I; Mazzetti S; Tachos N; Regge D; Fotiadis DI; Marias K; Tsiknakis M JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2023 Sep; 7():e2300101. PubMed ID: 38061012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Mapping Local Biospecimen Records to the OMOP Common Data Model. Michael CL; Sholle ET; Wulff RT; Roboz GJ; Campion TR AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc; 2020; 2020():422-429. PubMed ID: 32477663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Creating a Common Data Model for Comparative Effectiveness with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership. FitzHenry F; Resnic FS; Robbins SL; Denton J; Nookala L; Meeker D; Ohno-Machado L; Matheny ME Appl Clin Inform; 2015; 6(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 26448797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Adoption of the OMOP CDM for Cancer Research using Real-world Data: Current Status and Opportunities. Wang L; Wen A; Fu S; Ruan X; Huang M; Li R; Lu Q; Williams AE; Liu H medRxiv; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39228725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Fidelity assessment of a clinical practice research datalink conversion to the OMOP common data model. Matcho A; Ryan P; Fife D; Reich C Drug Saf; 2014 Nov; 37(11):945-59. PubMed ID: 25187016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Data model harmonization for the All Of Us Research Program: Transforming i2b2 data into the OMOP common data model. Klann JG; Joss MAH; Embree K; Murphy SN PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212463. PubMed ID: 30779778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. An Ontology-Based Approach for Consolidating Patient Data Standardized With European Norm/International Organization for Standardization 13606 (EN/ISO 13606) Into Joint Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Repositories: Description of a Methodology. Frid S; Pastor Duran X; Bracons Cucó G; Pedrera-Jiménez M; Serrano-Balazote P; Muñoz Carrero A; Lozano-Rubí R JMIR Med Inform; 2023 Mar; 11():e44547. PubMed ID: 36884279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Enhancing healthcare process analysis through object-centric process mining: Transforming OMOP common data models into object-centric event logs. Park G; Lee Y; Cho M J Biomed Inform; 2024 Aug; 156():104682. PubMed ID: 38944260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Enhancing Healthcare Informatics: Integrating Category Theory Reasoning into OMOP-CDM Ontology Model. Albarran R; Lamy JB Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Aug; 316():1427-1431. PubMed ID: 39176649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. How to customize common data models for rare diseases: an OMOP-based implementation and lessons learned. Ahmadi N; Zoch M; Guengoeze O; Facchinello C; Mondorf A; Stratmann K; Musleh K; Erasmus HP; Tchertov J; Gebler R; Schaaf J; Frischen LS; Nasirian A; Dai J; Henke E; Tremblay D; Srisuwananukorn A; Bornhäuser M; Röllig C; Eckardt JN; Middeke JM; Wolfien M; Sedlmayr M Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2024 Aug; 19(1):298. PubMed ID: 39143600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparative patient-level prediction study in OMOP CDM: applicative potential and insights from synthetic data. Ahmadi N; Nguyen QV; Sedlmayr M; Wolfien M Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):2287. PubMed ID: 38280887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Modeling Patient Treatment Trajectories Using Markov Chains for Cost Analysis. Haug M; Kolde R; Oja M; Pajusalu M Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 May; 302():755-756. PubMed ID: 37203488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]