123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35612644)
1. Efficacy of the scatter correction algorithm in portable chest radiography.
Lawson M; Qian L; Lau KK; Lau T; Massey D; Badawy M
Emerg Radiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):809-817. PubMed ID: 35612644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proof of Concept: Phantom Study to Ensure Quality and Safety of Portable Chest Radiography Through Glass During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Rai A; MacGregor K; Hunt B; Gontar A; Ditkofsky N; Deva D; Mathur S
Invest Radiol; 2021 Mar; 56(3):135-140. PubMed ID: 32773486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ITERATIVE SCATTER CORRECTION FOR GRID-LESS BEDSIDE CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: PERFORMANCE FOR A CHEST PHANTOM.
Mentrup D; Jockel S; Menser B; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low contrast detectability and spatial resolution with model-based Iterative reconstructions of MDCT images: a phantom and cadaveric study.
Millon D; Vlassenbroek A; Van Maanen AG; Cambier SE; Coche EE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):927-937. PubMed ID: 27300195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of flexible noise control (FNC) image processing parameters on portable chest radiography.
Kirby KM; Ren L; Daly TR; Tandon YK; Bartholmai BJ; Schueler BA; Long Z
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13812. PubMed ID: 36321326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-ratio grid considerations in mobile chest radiography.
Scott AW; Gauntt DM; Yester MV; Barnes GT
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3142-53. PubMed ID: 22755699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterizing Scatter Correction Software of 5 Mobile Radiography Units: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study.
Gossye T; Buytaert D; Smeets PV; Morbée L; Vereecke E; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2022 Jul; 57(7):444-452. PubMed ID: 35085123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Software Parameter Settings on Image Quality of Virtual Grid Processed Radiography Images: A Contrast-Detail Phantom Study.
Gossye T; Smeets PV; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):374-380. PubMed ID: 31985603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive noise reduction for dual-energy x-ray imaging based on spatial variations in beam attenuation.
Romadanov I; Sattarivand M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245023. PubMed ID: 32554889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study.
Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):571-580. PubMed ID: 31385049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can advanced edge enhancement software improve image quality to visualise tubes, catheters and wires in digital chest radiographs?
Kristensen SV; Outzen C; Grau LM; Larsen TR; Bidstrup M; Egeskjold MV; Knude JA; Juhl D; Precht H
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jan; 29(1):165-170. PubMed ID: 36395686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved Bayesian image estimation for digital chest radiography.
Baydush AH; Bowsher JE; Laading JK; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 9127306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality and dose differences caused by vendor-specific image processing of neonatal radiographs.
Sensakovic WF; O'Dell MC; Letter H; Kohler N; Rop B; Cook J; Logsdon G; Varich L
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Oct; 46(11):1606-13. PubMed ID: 27488507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EVALUATION OF DOSE REDUCTION POTENTIALS OF A NOVEL SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE FOR BEDSIDE CHEST X-RAY IMAGING.
Renger B; Brieskorn C; Toth V; Mentrup D; Jockel S; Lohöfer F; Schwarz M; Rummeny EJ; Noël PB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):60-7. PubMed ID: 26977074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of image quality for real-time target tracking using simultaneous kV-MV imaging.
Luo W; Yoo S; Wu QJ; Wang Z; Yin FF
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5501-9. PubMed ID: 19175109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.
Vassileva J
Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):837-42. PubMed ID: 12381693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Usefulness of Post-processing Scatter Correction in Portable Abdominal Radiography Using a Low Ratio Anti-scatter Grid].
Ichikawa H; Yamada Y; Sawane Y; Terabe M; Ono T; Nishikawa M; Yamaguchi M; Shimada H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(9):885-891. PubMed ID: 31548465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
