215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35612645)
1. Two-body wear of occlusal splint materials from subtractive computer-aided manufacturing and three-dimensional printing.
Schmeiser F; Baumert U; Stawarczyk B
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5857-5866. PubMed ID: 35612645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance and 2-body wear of 3-dimensional-printed occlusal devices.
Lutz AM; Hampe R; Roos M; Lümkemann N; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):166-172. PubMed ID: 30647000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of wear behaviour of various occlusal splint materials and manufacturing processes.
Grymak A; Waddell JN; Aarts JM; Ma S; Choi JJE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105053. PubMed ID: 34998068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM 3D-printed zirconia, CAD/CAM milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate ultra-thin occlusal veneers on molars.
Ioannidis A; Bomze D; Hämmerle CHF; Hüsler J; Birrer O; Mühlemann S
Dent Mater; 2020 Apr; 36(4):e109-e116. PubMed ID: 31992483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-body wear and surface hardness of occlusal splint materials.
Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S; Lassila L
Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):916-922. PubMed ID: 36288940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints.
Orgev A; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel.
D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Rondoni GD; De Angelis F
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 26553254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of layer thickness and polishing on wear resistance of additively manufactured occlusal splints.
Diken Türksayar AA; Diker B
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105101. PubMed ID: 38801940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of 3D printing system and post-curing atmosphere on micro- and nano-wear of additive-manufactured occlusal splint materials.
Wada J; Wada K; Garoushi S; Shinya A; Wakabayashi N; Iwamoto T; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105799. PubMed ID: 37028121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of enamel wear by 3 occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study.
Borg H; Azer SS; El Hadary A; Helaly O; Shoeib A; Hassan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):743.e1-743.e6. PubMed ID: 37743141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of material and antagonist type on the wear of occlusal devices with different compositions fabricated by using conventional, additive, and subtractive manufacturing.
Ateş G; Demirel M; Donmez MB; Dayan SÇ; Sülün T
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1235.e1-1235.e8. PubMed ID: 38594086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists.
Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods.
Peng CC; Chung KH; Yau HT; Ramos V
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):514-522. PubMed ID: 31353116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wear Behavior of Occlusal Splint Materials Manufactured By Various Methods: A Systematic Review.
Grymak A; Aarts JM; Ma S; Waddell JN; Choi JJE
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):472-487. PubMed ID: 34516696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics.
Park JH; Park S; Lee K; Yun KD; Lim HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 24199603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodology investigation: Impact of crown geometry, crown, abutment and antagonist material and thermal loading on the two-body wear of dental materials.
Schmeiser F; Arbogast F; Ruppel H; Mayinger F; Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2022 Feb; 38(2):266-280. PubMed ID: 34953628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated bite splints: milling vs 3D printing.
Marcel R; Reinhard H; Andreas K
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Dec; 24(12):4607-4615. PubMed ID: 32436163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of build orientation on the trueness of occlusal splints fabricated by three-dimensional printing.
Cameron AB; Tong K; Tadakamadla S; Evans JL; Abuzar M
J Oral Sci; 2023 Oct; 65(4):261-264. PubMed ID: 37690838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
