150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35612917)
1. Narrative Assessments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review to Identify Evidence-Based Quality Indicators.
Chakroun M; Dion VR; Ouellet K; Graillon A; Désilets V; Xhignesse M; St-Onge C
Acad Med; 2022 Nov; 97(11):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 35612917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of gender dyads on the quality of narrative assessments of general surgery trainees.
Roshan A; Farooq A; Acai A; Wagner N; Sonnadara RR; Scott TM; Karimuddin AA
Am J Surg; 2022 Jul; 224(1 Pt A):179-184. PubMed ID: 34911639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the value of structured narrative feedback within the Serious Illness Conversation-Evaluation Exercise (SIC-Ex): a qualitative analysis.
Ko J; Roze des Ordons A; Ballard M; Shenkier T; Simon JE; Fyles G; Lefresne S; Hawley P; Chen C; McKenzie M; Sanders J; Bernacki R
BMJ Open; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e078385. PubMed ID: 38286701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility, quality and validity of narrative multisource feedback in postgraduate training: a mixed-method study.
Holm EA; Al-Bayati SJL; Barfod TS; Lembeck MA; Pedersen H; Ramberg E; Klemmensen ÅK; Sorensen JL
BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e047019. PubMed ID: 34321296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discriminating Features of Narrative Evaluations of Communication Skills During an OSCE.
Wilby KJ; Govaerts M; Austin Z; Dolmans D
Teach Learn Med; 2019; 31(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 30755046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Milestone Implementation's Impact on Narrative Comments and Perception of Feedback for Internal Medicine Residents: a Mixed Methods Study.
Raaum SE; Lappe K; Colbert-Getz JM; Milne CK
J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Jun; 34(6):929-935. PubMed ID: 30891692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of written narrative feedback and reflection in a modified mini-clinical evaluation exercise: an observational study.
Pelgrim EA; Kramer AW; Mokkink HG; Van der Vleuten CP
BMC Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 12():97. PubMed ID: 23075126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the Quality of Narrative Comments by Rotation Setting.
Roshan A; Wagner N; Acai A; Emmerton-Coughlin H; Sonnadara RR; Scott TM; Karimuddin AA
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):2070-2077. PubMed ID: 34301523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and classify patient-centred quality indicators.
Jolley RJ; Lorenzetti DL; Manalili K; Lu M; Quan H; Santana MJ
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e013632. PubMed ID: 28057655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessors' interpretations of narrative data on communication skills in a summative OSCE.
Wilby KJ; Dolmans DHJM; Austin Z; Govaerts MJB
Med Educ; 2019 Oct; 53(10):1003-1012. PubMed ID: 31304615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of Narratives in Assessment: Piloting a List of Evidence-Based Quality Indicators.
Chakroun M; Dion VR; Ouellet K; Graillon A; Désilets V; Xhignesse M; St-Onge C
Perspect Med Educ; 2023; 12(1):XX. PubMed ID: 37252269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trainees' perspectives of assessment messages: a narrative systematic review.
Scarff CE; Bearman M; Chiavaroli N; Trumble S
Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 53(3):221-233. PubMed ID: 30672012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The McMaster Narrative Comment Rating Tool: Development and Initial Validity Evidence.
McGuire N; Acai A; Sonnadara RR
Teach Learn Med; 2023 Nov; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 37964518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making.
de Jong LH; Bok HGJ; Schellekens LH; Kremer WDJ; Jonker FH; van der Vleuten CPM
BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):409. PubMed ID: 35643442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
Daudt HM; van Mossel C; Scott SJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():48. PubMed ID: 23522333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital Quality Reporting in the United States: Does Report Card Design and Incorporation of Patient Narrative Comments Affect Hospital Choice?
Emmert M; Schlesinger M
Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 52(3):933-958. PubMed ID: 27324087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing trainee's performance using reported observations: Perceptions of nurse meta-assessors.
Blanchette P; Poitras ME; St-Onge C
Nurse Educ Today; 2023 Jul; 126():105836. PubMed ID: 37167832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
