These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35612936)

  • 1. The shock team: a multidisciplinary approach to early patient phenotyping and appropriate care escalation in cardiogenic shock.
    Brusca SB; Caughron H; Njoroge JN; Cheng R; O'Brien CG; Barnett CF
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2022 May; 37(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 35612936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.
    Pahuja M; Yerasi C; Lam PH; Hashim H; Ben-Dor I; Bernardo NL; Satler LF; Sheikh FH; Najjar SS; Molina EJ; Waksman R
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Apr; 25(4):213-227. PubMed ID: 36847990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardiogenic shock teams and centres: a contemporary review of multidisciplinary care for cardiogenic shock.
    Moghaddam N; van Diepen S; So D; Lawler PR; Fordyce CB
    ESC Heart Fail; 2021 Apr; 8(2):988-998. PubMed ID: 33452763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Cardiac ICUs With Versus Without Shock Teams.
    Papolos AI; Kenigsberg BB; Berg DD; Alviar CL; Bohula E; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Drakos S; Gerber DA; Guo J; Horowitz JM; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Metkus TS; Nativi-Nicolau J; Snell JR; Sinha SS; Tymchak WJ; Van Diepen S; Morrow DA; Barnett CF;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 78(13):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 34556316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complete Hemodynamic Profiling With Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In-Hospital Mortality.
    Garan AR; Kanwar M; Thayer KL; Whitehead E; Zweck E; Hernandez-Montfort J; Mahr C; Haywood JL; Harwani NM; Wencker D; Sinha SS; Vorovich E; Abraham J; O'Neill W; Burkhoff D; Kapur NK
    JACC Heart Fail; 2020 Nov; 8(11):903-913. PubMed ID: 33121702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: Shock Team or Bust?
    Kim DH
    Can J Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 36(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 32036864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Building a cardiogenic shock response team: key considerations necessary to improve outcomes.
    Varma B; Katz JN; Alviar CL
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2024 Aug; 30(4):354-361. PubMed ID: 38872365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impella percutaneous left ventricular assist device as mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary academic medical center.
    Nouri SN; Malick W; Masoumi A; Fried JA; Topkara VK; Brener MI; Ahmad Y; Prasad M; Rabbani LE; Takeda K; Karmpaliotis D; Moses JW; Leon MB; Kirtane AJ; Garan AR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 33325612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Stabilizes and Potentially Rescues Patients in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.
    Tongers J; Sieweke JT; Kühn C; Napp LC; Flierl U; Röntgen P; Schmitto JD; Sedding DG; Haverich A; Bauersachs J; Schäfer A
    Circ Heart Fail; 2020 Mar; 13(3):e005853. PubMed ID: 32164431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial outcomes of a multidisciplinary network for the care of patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Hernández-Pérez FJ; Álvarez-Avelló JM; Forteza A; Gómez-Bueno M; González A; López-Ibor JV; Silva-Melchor L; Goicolea J; Martín CE; Iranzo R; Goirigolzarri-Artaza J; Escudier-Villa JM; Ortega-Marcos J; Oteo-Domínguez JF; Herrero-Cano Á; Moñivas V; Mingo-Santos S; Villar S; Jiménez-Blanco M; Coscia C; Serrano-Fiz S; Alonso-Pulpón L; Segovia-Cubero J
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2021 Jan; 74(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 32448727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of a multidisciplinary mechanical circulatory support network in cardiogenic shock in a centre without heart transplant program: A successful interprofessional coordination model.
    Salamanca J; Díez-Villanueva P; Canabal A; Reyes G; Ramasco F; Alfonso F
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 69(3):129-133. PubMed ID: 35279416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mechanical support of cardiogenic shock.
    Rob D; Bělohlávek J
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2021 Aug; 27(4):440-446. PubMed ID: 33929344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shock Teams: A Contemporary Review.
    Stevenson MJ; Kenigsberg BB; Singam NSV; Papolos AI
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Dec; 25(12):1657-1663. PubMed ID: 37861851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of a Cardiogenic Shock Team and Clinical Outcomes (INOVA-SHOCK Registry): Observational and Retrospective Study.
    Tehrani B; Truesdell A; Singh R; Murphy C; Saulino P
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2018 Jun; 7(6):e160. PubMed ID: 29954728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Cardiogenic Shock at Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Non-Left Ventricular Assist Device Centers.
    Wang JI; Lu DY; Mhs ; Feldman DN; McCullough SA; Goyal P; Karas MG; Sobol I; Horn EM; Kim LK; Krishnan U
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Dec; 9(23):e017326. PubMed ID: 33222608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiogenic shock code 2023. Expert document for a multidisciplinary organization that allows quality care.
    Martínez-Sellés M; Hernández-Pérez FJ; Uribarri A; Martín Villén L; Zapata L; Alonso JJ; Amat-Santos IJ; Ariza-Solé A; Barrabés JA; Barrio JM; Canteli Á; Alonso-Fernández-Gatta M; Corbí Pascual MJ; Díaz D; Crespo-Leiro MG; de la Torre-Hernández JM; Ferrera C; García González MJ; García-Carreño J; García-Guereta L; García Quintana A; Jorge Pérez P; González-Juanatey JR; López de Sá E; Sánchez PL; Monteagudo M; Palomo López N; Reyes G; Rosell F; Solla Buceta MA; Segovia-Cubero J; Sionis Green A; Stepanenko A; Iglesias Álvarez D; Viana Tejedor A; Voces R; Fuset Cabanes MP; Gimeno Costa JR; Díaz J; Fernández-Avilés F
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2023 Apr; 76(4):261-269. PubMed ID: 36565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hospital market concentration and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Vohra AS; Jang SJ; Feldman DN; Goyal P; Krishnan U; Sciria C; Cheung JW; Kim LK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Jan; 22(1):89. PubMed ID: 35045849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.