These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35612936)

  • 41. National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Yeh RW
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(18):e2152-e2159. PubMed ID: 29400657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Surgeon's Role in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Sperry AE; Williams M; Atluri P; Szeto WY; Cevasco M; Bermudez CA; Acker MA; Ibrahim M
    Curr Heart Fail Rep; 2021 Aug; 18(4):240-251. PubMed ID: 33956313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Arora S; Lahewala S; Kumar V; Shantha GPS; Jentzer JC; Stulak JM; Gersh BJ; Gulati R; Rihal CS; Prasad A; Deshmukh AJ
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Nov; 7(22):e010193. PubMed ID: 30571481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Outcomes in cardiogenic shock: the role of surrogate endpoints.
    Kosyakovsky LB; Marbach JA; Nguyen K; Mukundan S; Chweich H; Kapur NK
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2022 Aug; 28(4):442-452. PubMed ID: 35757956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Value of Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Saxena A; Garan AR; Kapur NK; O'Neill WW; Lindenfeld J; Pinney SP; Uriel N; Burkhoff D; Kern M
    Circulation; 2020 Apr; 141(14):1184-1197. PubMed ID: 32250695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock and acute heart failure: current evidence.
    Schrage B; Westermann D
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2019 Aug; 25(4):391-396. PubMed ID: 31135393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Impella Microaxial Flow Catheter Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Myocarditis Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Analysis From the Global cVAD Registry.
    Annamalai SK; Esposito ML; Jorde L; Schreiber T; A Hall S; O'Neill WW; Kapur NK
    J Card Fail; 2018 Oct; 24(10):706-710. PubMed ID: 30244180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Important role of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Truby L; Naka Y; Kalesan B; Ota T; Kirtane AJ; Kodali S; Nikic N; Mundy L; Colombo P; Jorde UP; Takayama H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Aug; 48(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 25480935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Timing of mechanical circulatory support during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Archilletti F; Giuliani L; Dangas GD; Ricci F; Benedetto U; Radico F; Gallina S; Rossi S; Maddestra N; Zimarino M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 99(4):998-1005. PubMed ID: 35182020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Thiele H; Jobs A; Ouweneel DM; Henriques JPS; Seyfarth M; Desch S; Eitel I; Pöss J; Fuernau G; de Waha S
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Dec; 38(47):3523-3531. PubMed ID: 29020341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Enezate T; Eniezat M; Thomas J
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 124(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 31204034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Therapeutic Advances in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.
    Chioncel O; Collins SP; Ambrosy AP; Pang PS; Radu RI; Antohi EL; Masip J; Butler J; Iliescu VA
    Am J Ther; 2019; 26(2):e234-e247. PubMed ID: 30839372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mechanical Circulatory Support Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights From the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.
    Goldsweig AM; Tak HJ; Alraies MC; Park J; Smith C; Baker J; Lin L; Patel N; O'Neill WW; Basir MB;
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2021 Nov; 32():58-62. PubMed ID: 33358390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Longitudinal impact of temporary mechanical circulatory support on durable ventricular assist device outcomes: An IMACS registry propensity matched analysis.
    Hernandez-Montfort JA; Xie R; Ton VK; Meyns B; Nakatani T; Yanase M; Pettit S; Shaw S; Netuka I; Kirklin J; Goldstein DJ; Cowger J
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2020 Feb; 39(2):145-156. PubMed ID: 31866174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.
    Alasnag M; Truesdell AG; Williams H; Martinez SC; Qadri SK; Skendelas JP; Jakobleff WA; Alasnag M
    Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2020 Apr; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 32328843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated with the Impella Device.
    Rohm CL; Gadidov B; Leitson M; Ray HE; Prasad R
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 124(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 31262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Acute mechanical circulatory support for fulminant myocarditis complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Mody KP; Takayama H; Landes E; Yuzefpolskaya M; Colombo PC; Naka Y; Jorde UP; Uriel N
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2014 Mar; 7(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 24420915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Utilization of the Impella for hemodynamic support during percutaneous intervention and cardiogenic shock: an insight.
    Nalluri N; Patel N; Saouma S; Anugu VR; Anugula D; Asti D; Mehta V; Kumar V; Atti V; Edla S; Grewal RK; Khan HM; Kanotra R; Maniatis G; Kandov R; Lafferty JC; Dyal M; Alfonso CE; Cohen MG
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 Oct; 14(10):789-804. PubMed ID: 28862481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.