BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35613661)

  • 1. Multichamber Strain Characterization Is a Robust Prognosticator for Both Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.
    Ye Z; Yang LT; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Padang R; Luis SA; Nkomo VT; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2022 Sep; 35(9):956-965. PubMed ID: 35613661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Demonstrate Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling and Impaired Cardiac Function Before Surgery With Increased Risk of Postoperative Heart Failure.
    Wedin JO; Vedin O; Rodin S; Simonson OE; Hörsne Malmborg J; Pallin J; James SK; Flachskampf FA; Ståhle E; Grinnemo KH
    Circulation; 2022 Oct; 146(17):1310-1322. PubMed ID: 35971843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aortic Stenosis Progression, Cardiac Damage, and Survival: Comparison Between Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
    Yang LT; Boler A; Medina-Inojosa JR; Scott CG; Maurer MJ; Eleid MF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Tribouilloy C; Michelena HI
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 14(6):1113-1126. PubMed ID: 33744153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.
    Huntley GD; Thaden JJ; Alsidawi S; Michelena HI; Maleszewski JJ; Edwards WD; Scott CG; Pislaru SV; Pellikka PA; Greason KL; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Nkomo VT
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 29029001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Asymptomatic Patients With Stenotic Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
    Sia CH; Ho JS; Chua JJ; Tan BY; Ngiam NJ; Chew N; Sim HW; Chen R; Lee CH; Yeo TC; Kong WK; Poh KK
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 128():210-215. PubMed ID: 32534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.
    Xiong TY; Wang X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Zheng MX; Zhou X; Peng Y; Wei JF; Feng Y; Chen M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 29915878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors of conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with balloon-expandable valve for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.
    Miyashita H; Moriyama N; Yamanaka F; Saito S; Lehtola H; Piuhola J; Niemelä M; Laine M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1576-1586. PubMed ID: 35543515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic Implications of Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype on Progression of Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ascending Aorta Dilatation.
    Chew NWS; Phua K; Ho YJ; Zhang A; Lin N; Ngiam JN; Lau YX; Teo VXY; Sia CH; Loh PH; Kuntjoro I; Wong RCC; Lee CH; Tan HC; Yeo TC; Kong WKF; Poh KK
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 161():76-83. PubMed ID: 34627597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.
    Disha K; Dubslaff G; Rouman M; Fey B; Borger MA; Barker AJ; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 28040769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].
    Zhang JQ; Chi CW; Zhao WL; Meng QT; Wang LD; Liu JY; Sun FZ; Zhang SL; Liu JH
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 36517440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac Mechanics in Isolated Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease With Normal Ejection Fraction: A Study of Various Valvular Lesion Types.
    Zhang X; Zhu M; He T; Yuan J; Zhu H; Morrisroe DE; Ashraf M; Sahn DJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Nov; 94(47):e2085. PubMed ID: 26632719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed tomography calcium scoring in aortic stenosis: bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology.
    Ye Z; Clavel MA; Foley TA; Pibarot P; Enriquez-Sarano M; Michelena HI
    Heart; 2024 Mar; 110(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 37903555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease and Stenosis: The National Echo Database of Australia.
    Lim MS; Strange G; Playford D; Stewart S; Celermajer DS
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Sep; 10(17):e020785. PubMed ID: 34459236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aortic stiffness in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiovascular MRI: a comparison between bicuspid and tricuspid valves.
    Singh A; Horsfield MA; Bekele S; Greenwood JP; Dawson DK; Berry C; Hogrefe K; Kelly DJ; Houston JG; Guntur Ramkumar P; Uddin A; Suzuki T; McCann GP
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2340-2349. PubMed ID: 30488106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehensive MR Analysis of Cardiac Function, Aortic Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Strain in Pediatric Cohort with Isolated Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
    Stefek HA; Berhane H; Robinson JD; Reilly B; Ruh A; Markl M; Rigsby CK
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 40(7):1450-1459. PubMed ID: 31342116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of aortic root geometry with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve: real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study.
    Shibayama K; Harada K; Berdejo J; Tanaka J; Mihara H; Itabashi Y; Shiota T
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Nov; 27(11):1143-52. PubMed ID: 25155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patterns of ascending aortic dilatation and predictors of surgical replacement of the aorta: A comparison of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve patients over eight years of follow-up.
    Agnese V; Pasta S; Michelena HI; Minà C; Romano GM; Carerj S; Zito C; Maalouf JF; Foley TA; Raffa G; Clemenza F; Pilato M; Bellavia D
    J Mol Cell Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 135():31-39. PubMed ID: 31348923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional Aortic Root Parameters and Expression of Aortopathy in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Girdauskas E; Rouman M; Disha K; Fey B; Dubslaff G; Theis B; Petersen I; Gutberlet M; Borger MA; Kuntze T
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 67(15):1786-1796. PubMed ID: 27081018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.
    Zhou D; Yidilisi A; Fan J; Zhang Y; Dai H; Zhu G; Guo Y; He Y; Zhu Q; Lin X; Li H; Jiang J; Ng S; Li C; Ren K; Wang L; Liu X; Wang J
    EuroIntervention; 2022 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 35044300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heritability of aortic valve stenosis and bicuspid enrichment in families with aortic valve stenosis.
    Boureau AS; Karakachoff M; Le Scouarnec S; Capoulade R; Cueff C; de Decker L; Senage T; Verhoye JP; Baufreton C; Roussel JC; Dina C; Probst V; Schott JJ; Le Tourneau T
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Jul; 359():91-98. PubMed ID: 35427703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.