These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35613956)

  • 1. Comparison of Accuracy of Estimation of Cardiac Output by Thermodilution Versus the Fick Method Using Measured Oxygen Uptake.
    Narang N; Thibodeau JT; Parker WF; Grodin JL; Garg S; Tedford RJ; Levine BD; McGuire DK; Drazner MH
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 176():58-65. PubMed ID: 35613956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time gas-exchange measurement of oxygen consumption in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery.
    Chang AC; Kulik TJ; Hickey PR; Wessel DL
    Crit Care Med; 1993 Sep; 21(9):1369-75. PubMed ID: 8370302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: agreement with Fick and bolus thermodilution methods.
    Thrush D; Downs JB; Smith RA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1995 Aug; 9(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 7579109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oxygen Fick and modified carbon dioxide Fick cardiac outputs.
    Mahutte CK; Jaffe MB; Chen PA; Sasse SA; Wong DH; Sassoon CS
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Jan; 22(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 8124981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of impedance cardiography to direct Fick and thermodilution cardiac output determination in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
    Yung GL; Fedullo PF; Kinninger K; Johnson W; Channick RN
    Congest Heart Fail; 2004; 10(2 Suppl 2):7-10. PubMed ID: 15073478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thermodilution vs Estimated Fick Cardiac Output Measurement in Clinical Practice: An Analysis of Mortality From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (VA CART) Program and Vanderbilt University.
    Opotowsky AR; Hess E; Maron BA; Brittain EL; Barón AE; Maddox TM; Alshawabkeh LI; Wertheim BM; Xu M; Assad TR; Rich JD; Choudhary G; Tedford RJ
    JAMA Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 2(10):1090-1099. PubMed ID: 28877293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiac output determination in children: equivalence of the transpulmonary thermodilution method to the direct Fick principle.
    Pauli C; Fakler U; Genz T; Hennig M; Lorenz HP; Hess J
    Intensive Care Med; 2002 Jul; 28(7):947-52. PubMed ID: 12122535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick cardiac output in critically ill patients.
    Dhingra VK; Fenwick JC; Walley KR; Chittock DR; Ronco JJ
    Chest; 2002 Sep; 122(3):990-7. PubMed ID: 12226045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of cardiac output using real-time measurement of oxygen consumption during cardiac catheterization in children under 3 years of age.
    Seckeler MD; Hirsch R; Beekman RH; Goldstein BH
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2014; 9(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 24102795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods.
    Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Ahola T; Turjanmaa VM
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Nov; 23(11):1132-7. PubMed ID: 9434918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thermodilution vs estimated Fick cardiac output measurement in an elderly cohort of patients: A single-centre experience.
    Kresoja KP; Faragli A; Abawi D; Paul O; Pieske B; Post H; Alogna A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226561. PubMed ID: 31860679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continual trending of Fick variables in the critically ill patient.
    Quinn TJ; Weissman C; Kemper M
    Chest; 1991 Mar; 99(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 1899824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of VO
    Reiter T; Kerzner J; Fette G; Frantz S; Voelker W; Ertl G; Bauer W; Morbach C; Störk S; Güder G
    Herz; 2024 Feb; 49(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 37439804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiac output assessment methods in left ventricular assist device patients: A problem of heteroscedasticity.
    Azih NI; Read JM; Jackson GR; Inampudi C; Witer L; Kilic A; Pope NH; Hajj J; Haddad F; Tedford RJ; Houston BA
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2023 Feb; 42(2):145-149. PubMed ID: 36481112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spirometric versus Fick-derived oxygen consumption: which method is better?
    Thrush DN
    Crit Care Med; 1996 Jan; 24(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 8565545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of cardiac output measurement techniques: thermodilution, Doppler, CO2-rebreathing and the direct Fick method.
    Espersen K; Jensen EW; Rosenborg D; Thomsen JK; Eliasen K; Olsen NV; Kanstrup IL
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1995 Feb; 39(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 7793193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
    Engoren M; Barbee D
    Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limitations of the metabolic rate meter for measuring oxygen consumption and cardiac output.
    Lange RA; Dehmer GJ; Wells PJ; Tate DA; Jain A; Flores ED; Nichols TC; Hillis LD
    Am J Cardiol; 1989 Oct; 64(12):783-6. PubMed ID: 2801530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between cardiac output measured by thermodilution technique and calculated by O2 and modified CO2 Fick methods using a new metabolic monitor.
    Brandi LS; Bertolini R; Pieri M; Giunta F; Calafà M
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Aug; 23(8):908-15. PubMed ID: 9310812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuous measurement of cardiac output by the Fick principle in infants and children: comparison with the thermodilution method.
    Wippermann CF; Huth RG; Schmidt FX; Thul J; Betancor M; Schranz D
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 May; 22(5):467-71. PubMed ID: 8796404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.