BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35614028)

  • 1. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid on-site evaluation improves the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid pancreatic lesions irrespective of technique: A single-centre experience.
    Milluzzo SM; Olivari N; Rossi G; Bianchi D; Liserre B; Graffeo M; Lovera M; Correale L; Hassan C; Spada C
    Cytopathology; 2023 Jul; 34(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 37186418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.
    Haba S; Yamao K; Bhatia V; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Imaoka H; Niwa Y; Tajika M; Kondo S; Tanaka T; Shimizu Y; Yatabe Y; Hosoda W; Kawakami H; Sakamoto N
    J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 23090002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: experience from a single center.
    Guvendir I; Zemheri IE; Ozdil K
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 22(1):264. PubMed ID: 35624440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
    Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid On-Site Evaluation by Endosonographer of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nebel JA; Soldan M; Dumonceau JM; de Souza Carvalho CE; Chagas VLA; de Assis PG; Lapa E Silva JR; Rezende GFDM
    Pancreas; 2021 Jul; 50(6):815-821. PubMed ID: 34347723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy was not more cost-effective than fine-needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation in gastrointestinal lesions diagnosis.
    Sbeit W; Khoury T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):944-947. PubMed ID: 33973746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions.
    Mehmood S; Jahan A; Loya A; Yusuf MA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 43(4):278-86. PubMed ID: 25088987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cytology with rapid on-site examination (ROSE) does not improve diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic lesions.
    Estrada P; Benson M; Gopal D; Buehler D; Pfau P
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 31356003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on the adequacy of endoscopic-ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Matynia AP; Schmidt RL; Barraza G; Layfield LJ; Siddiqui AA; Adler DG
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 29(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 24783248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration vs core needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency.
    Syed A; Babich O; Rao B; Singh S; Carleton N; Gulati A; Kulkarni A; Garg M; Farah K; Kochhar G; Morrissey S; Mitre M; Kulkarni A; Dhawan M; Silverman JF; Pharaon M; Thakkar S
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1138-1144. PubMed ID: 31313531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EUS-FNA, ancillary studies and their clinical utility in patients with mediastinal, pancreatic, and other abdominal lesions.
    Saqib M; Maruf M; Bashir S; Mehmood S; Akhter N; Yusuf MA; Loya A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Nov; 48(11):1058-1066. PubMed ID: 32515558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors Influencing the Diagnostic Performance of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration/Biopsy after the First Inconclusive Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions.
    Cho JH; Kim J; Lee HS; Ryu SJ; Jang SI; Kim EJ; Kang H; Lee SS; Song TJ; Bang S
    Gut Liver; 2024 Jan; 18(1):184-191. PubMed ID: 37317559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in pretest prediction and diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma].
    Wu L; Guo W; Li Y; Cheng T; Yao Y; Zhang Y; Liu B; Zhong M; Li S; Deng X; Zhu W
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2018 Sep; 38(10):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 30377133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration in gastrointestinal lesions.
    Khoury T; Sbeit W
    Cytopathology; 2021 May; 32(3):326-330. PubMed ID: 33606331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.