533 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35614159)
1. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selection of plastic solid waste treatment technology based on cumulative prospect theory and fuzzy DEMATEL.
Mao Q; Chen J; Lv J; Guo M; Xie P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):41505-41536. PubMed ID: 36633741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sustainable supply chain partner selection and order allocation: A hybrid fuzzy PL-TODIM based MCGDM approach.
Zhong S; Zhang J; He X; Liu S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0271194. PubMed ID: 36137146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.
Büyüközkan G; Tüfekçi G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53507-53519. PubMed ID: 34031840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An integrated decision making approach for selecting a sustainable waste water treatment technology.
Narayanamoorthy S; Brainy JV; Sulaiman R; Ferrara M; Ahmadian A; Kang D
Chemosphere; 2022 Aug; 301():134568. PubMed ID: 35439483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection.
Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
Springerplus; 2016; 5():501. PubMed ID: 27186465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Green supplier selection for textile industry: a case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
Celik E; Yucesan M; Gul M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(45):64793-64817. PubMed ID: 34313933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A fuzzy multi-stakeholder multi-criteria methodology for water allocation and reuse in metropolitan areas.
Pourmand E; Mahjouri N
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jun; 190(7):444. PubMed ID: 29961116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sustainability prioritization of sewage sludge to energy scenarios with hybrid-data consideration: a fuzzy decision-making framework based on full consistency method and fusion ranking model.
Tang C; Xu D; Chen N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(5):5548-5565. PubMed ID: 32970262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC method based on multi-criteria decision analysis.
Zarin R; Azmat M; Naqvi SR; Saddique Q; Ullah S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):19726-19741. PubMed ID: 33410005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A fuzzy multi-objective optimization approach for treated wastewater allocation.
Tayebikhorami S; Nikoo MR; Sadegh M
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jun; 191(7):468. PubMed ID: 31243555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of food waste treatment techniques using the complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized TODIM method with weighted power geometric operator.
Cao Y; Han X; Wu X; Deveci M; Kadry S; Delen D
J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 353():120105. PubMed ID: 38325282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection.
Gong JW; Liu HC; You XY; Yin L
Appl Soft Comput; 2021 Apr; 102():107118. PubMed ID: 36570416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Assessing the Emergency Department Performance during the COVID-19 Outbreak.
Ortíz-Barrios M; Jaramillo-Rueda N; Gul M; Yucesan M; Jiménez-Delgado G; Alfaro-Saíz JJ
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multi-criteria group decision-making framework for investment assessment of offshore floating wind-solar-aquaculture project under probabilistic linguistic environment.
Mao Q; Guo M; Lv J; Chen J; Tian M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):40752-40782. PubMed ID: 36622615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-criteria decision making--an approach to setting priorities in health care.
Nobre FF; Trotta LT; Gomes LF
Stat Med; 1999 Dec; 18(23):3345-54. PubMed ID: 10602156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of land suitability for olive mill wastewater disposal site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC in a GIS.
Aydi A; Abichou T; Nasr IH; Louati M; Zairi M
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jan; 188(1):59. PubMed ID: 26711812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
