These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35615750)

  • 1. New Confidence Intervals for Relative Risk of Two Correlated Proportions.
    DelRocco N; Wang Y; Wu D; Yang Y; Shan G
    Stat Biosci; 2023; 15(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 35615750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuity corrected score confidence interval for the difference in proportions in paired data.
    Chang P; Liu R; Hou T; Yan X; Shan G
    J Appl Stat; 2024; 51(1):139-152. PubMed ID: 38179158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence intervals for the difference between independent binomial proportions: comparison using a graphical approach and moving averages.
    Laud PJ; Dane A
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(5):294-308. PubMed ID: 25163425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuity corrected Wilson interval for the difference of two independent proportions.
    Shan G; Lou X; Wu SS
    J Stat Theory Appl; 2023 Jun; 22(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 37982044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel nonparametric confidence interval for differences of proportions for correlated binary data.
    Duan C; Cao Y; Zhou L; Tan MT; Chen P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2249-2263. PubMed ID: 27856961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.
    Tang NS; Li HQ; Tang ML; Li J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):323-38. PubMed ID: 25632882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate confidence intervals for proportion in studies with clustered binary outcome.
    Shan G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):3006-3018. PubMed ID: 32242483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interval estimation of relative risks for combined unilateral and bilateral correlated data.
    Wang K; Ma CX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jan; ():1-24. PubMed ID: 38196244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence intervals for a ratio of binomial proportions based on paired data.
    Bonett DG; Price RM
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):3039-47. PubMed ID: 16345058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A non-iterative accurate asymptotic confidence interval for the difference between two proportions.
    Wallenstein S
    Stat Med; 1997 Jun; 16(12):1329-36. PubMed ID: 9232756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric and nonparametric methods for confidence intervals and sample size planning for win probability in parallel-group randomized trials with Likert item and Likert scale data.
    Zou G; Zou L; Qiu SF
    Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(3):418-439. PubMed ID: 36524672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous confidence intervals of risk differences in stratified paired designs.
    Tang NS; Qiu SF; Tang ML; Zou GY; Yu D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 Mar; 23(2):361-77. PubMed ID: 23437944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of Some Approximate Confidence Intervals for a Single Proportion for Clustered Binary Outcome Data.
    Saha KK; Miller D; Wang S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 26569139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confidence intervals of the difference between areas under two ROC curves in matched-pair experiments.
    Zhang Y; Tang N
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(20):2621-2638. PubMed ID: 32390284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.
    Tang NS; Qiu SF; Tang ML; Pei YB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):233-59. PubMed ID: 20181778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conservative confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient for clustered binary data.
    Shan G
    J Appl Stat; 2022; 49(10):2535-2549. PubMed ID: 35757040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence interval construction for proportion ratio in paired studies based on hybrid method.
    Tang ML; Li HQ; Tang NS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Aug; 21(4):361-78. PubMed ID: 20876164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.