260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35616316)
1. Comparison of recurrence patterns in cervical cancer patients with positive lymph nodes versus negative.
Ji M; Liu Y; Hu Y; Sun J; Zhu H
Cancer Med; 2023 Jan; 12(1):306-314. PubMed ID: 35616316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognosis of unexpected and expected pathologic N1 non-small cell lung cancer.
Shin S; Kim HK; Choi YS; Kim K; Kim J; Shim YM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):969-75; discussion 975-6. PubMed ID: 23916803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic factors influencing pelvic, extra-pelvic, and intraperitoneal recurrences in lymph node-negative early-stage cervical cancer patients following radical hysterectomy.
Kong TW; Son JH; Paek J; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():94-99. PubMed ID: 32590168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oncologic Safety of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
Wong SM; Basik M; Florianova L; Margolese R; Dumitra S; Muanza T; Carbonneau A; Ferrario C; Boileau JF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 28(5):2621-2629. PubMed ID: 33095362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer: Five-year follow-up of patients with clinically node-negative or node-positive disease before treatment.
Galimberti V; Ribeiro Fontana SK; Maisonneuve P; Steccanella F; Vento AR; Intra M; Naninato P; Caldarella P; Iorfida M; Colleoni M; Viale G; Grana CM; Rotmensz N; Luini A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 26746091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical hysterectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients with stage IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer: outcomes for a series of 308 patients.
Tsuruga T; Fujimoto A; Kawana K; Mori M; Hasumi Y; Kino N; Tomio K; Miura S; Tanikawa M; Sone K; Miyamoto Y; Ikeda Y; Kojima S; Adachi K; Nagasaka K; Matsumoto Y; Arimoto T; Oda K; Nakagawa S; Horie K; Yasugi T; Yokota H; Osuga Y; Fujii T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 21(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 26438230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic factors in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer without lymph node metastasis and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy.
Ayhan A; Al RA; Baykal C; Demirtas E; Ayhan A; Yüce K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 15086728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical vaginal hysterectomy with extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.
Savino L; Borruto F; Comparetto C; Massi GB
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2001; 22(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11321490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Marconnet L; Rigaud J; Bouchot O
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2227-32. PubMed ID: 20399455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rates of pathologic nodal disease among cN0 and cN1 patients undergoing routine axillary ultrasound and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Weiss A; King C; Vincuilla J; Parker T; Portnow L; Nakhlis F; Dominici L; Mittendorf EA; King TA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Sep; 195(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 35900704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of the Number and the Location of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Locally Recurrent or Persistent Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Salvage Hysterectomy plus Lymphadenectomy.
Mabuchi S; Komura N; Kodama M; Maeda M; Matsumoto Y; Kamiura S
Curr Oncol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):4856-4867. PubMed ID: 35877245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of the patterns of cervical lymph node recurrence in patients with cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma after central neck lymph node dissection].
Huang H; Xu Z; Wang X; Wu Y; Liu S
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 37(10):771-5. PubMed ID: 26813598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival Benefit of Japanese Extended Lymphadenectomy for Clinically Node-Negative and Node-Positive Colorectal Cancers.
Ouchi A; Komori K; Kimura K; Kinoshita T; Shimizu Y; Nagino M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Feb; 61(2):162-171. PubMed ID: 29337770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a study of 32 cases.
Piura B; Rabinovich A; Friger M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18386460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pattern of lymph node metastasis and the optimal extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer.
Lee JM; Lee KB; Lee SK; Park CY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Jun; 33(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 17578357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Lymph node metastasis as a prognostic factor in cervical carcinoma].
Kobierski J; Emerich J; Królikowska B; Majdak E
Ginekol Pol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):925-9. PubMed ID: 12722375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
