256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35616808)
1. Brain partial volume correction with point spreading function reconstruction in high-resolution digital PET: comparison with an MR-based method in FDG imaging.
Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Shinohara Y; Shidahara M; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 36(8):717-727. PubMed ID: 35616808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visualization of small brain nuclei with a high-spatial resolution, clinically available whole-body PET scanner.
Shinohara Y; Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 38(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 37989801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of the partial volume correction method on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose brain kinetic modelling from dynamic PET images reconstructed with resolution model based OSEM.
Bowen SL; Byars LG; Michel CJ; Chonde DB; Catana C
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7081-106. PubMed ID: 24052021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cycle-consistent adversarial network for brain PET partial volume correction without prior anatomical information.
Sanaat A; Shooli H; Böhringer AS; Sadeghi M; Shiri I; Salimi Y; Ginovart N; Garibotto V; Arabi H; Zaidi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jun; 50(7):1881-1896. PubMed ID: 36808000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative role of motion and PSF compensation in whole-body oncologic PET-MR imaging.
Petibon Y; Huang C; Ouyang J; Reese TG; Li Q; Syrkina A; Chen YL; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042503. PubMed ID: 24694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-scanner Aβ-PET harmonization using barrel phantom spatial resolution matching.
Ruwanpathirana GP; Williams RC; Masters CL; Rowe CC; Johnston LA; Davey CE
Alzheimers Dement (Amst); 2024; 16(1):e12561. PubMed ID: 38476638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of partial volume effect correction on cerebral β-amyloid imaging in APP-Swe mice using [(18)F]-florbetaben PET.
Brendel M; Delker A; Rötzer C; Böning G; Carlsen J; Cyran C; Mille E; Gildehaus FJ; Cumming P; Baumann K; Steiner H; Haass C; Herms J; Bartenstein P; Rominger A
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():843-53. PubMed ID: 24055703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental evaluation and basis function optimization of the spatially variant image-space PSF on the Ingenuity PET/MR scanner.
Kotasidis FA; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):062501. PubMed ID: 24877835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.
Markiewicz PJ; da Costa-Luis C; Dickson J; Barnes A; Krokos G; MacKewn J; Clark T; Wimberley C; MacNaught G; Yaqub MM; Gispert JD; Hutton BF; Marsden P; Hammers A; Reader AJ; Ourselin S; Herholz K; Matthews JC; Barkhof F
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3298-3313. PubMed ID: 35271742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling for
Matheoud R; Lecchi M; Lizio D; Scabbio C; Marcassa C; Leva L; Del Sole A; Rodella C; Indovina L; Bracco C; Brambilla M; Zoccarato O
J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 24(3):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 26758376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Isotope specific resolution recovery image reconstruction in high resolution PET imaging.
Kotasidis FA; Angelis GI; Anton-Rodriguez J; Matthews JC; Reader AJ; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052503. PubMed ID: 24784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies.
Presotto L; Bettinardi V; Bagnalasta M; Scifo P; Savi A; Vanoli EG; Fallanca F; Picchio M; Perani D; Gianolli L; De Bernardi E
J Digit Imaging; 2022 Jun; 35(3):432-445. PubMed ID: 35091873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of motion and partial volume effects correction on PET myocardial perfusion imaging using simultaneous PET-MR.
Petibon Y; Guehl NJ; Reese TG; Ebrahimi B; Normandin MD; Shoup TM; Alpert NM; El Fakhri G; Ouyang J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):326-343. PubMed ID: 27997375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of
Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and Precision of Partial-Volume Correction in Oncological PET/CT Studies.
Cysouw MCF; Kramer GM; Hoekstra OS; Frings V; de Langen AJ; Smit EF; van den Eertwegh AJ; Oprea-Lager DE; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1642-1649. PubMed ID: 27230933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation.
Rousset OG; Ma Y; Evans AC
J Nucl Med; 1998 May; 39(5):904-11. PubMed ID: 9591599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
