These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35617274)
1. Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis. Chung DY; Jung HD; Kim DK; Lee MH; Lee SW; Paick S; Lee JY; Jeon SH PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268182. PubMed ID: 35617274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis. O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide. Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phukan C; Mclean A; Nambiar A; Mukherjee A; Somani B; Krishnamoorthy R; Sridhar A; Rajan P; Sooriakumaran P; Rai BP World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1123-1134. PubMed ID: 31089802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Tahra A; Sen UT; Sobay R; İnkaya A; Kucuk EV; Boylu U Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Jun; 46(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 35221232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Retzius sparing on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Tai TE; Wu CC; Kang YN; Wu JC Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):4020-4029. PubMed ID: 31617093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching. Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up. Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes. Checcucci E; Veccia A; Fiori C; Amparore D; Manfredi M; Di Dio M; Morra I; Galfano A; Autorino R; Bocciardi AM; Dasgupta P; Porpiglia F BJU Int; 2020 Jan; 125(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31373142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pelvic Anatomical Features After Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Intended for Early Recovery of Urinary Symptoms. Ota Y; Hamamoto S; Matsuyama N; Hamakawa T; Iwatsuki S; Etani T; Taguchi K; Naiki T; Ando R; Nakane A; Okada A; Kawai N; Kubota Y; Yasui T J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 32935558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kadhim H; Ang KM; Tan WS; Nathan A; Pavan N; Mazzon G; Al-Kadhi O; Di G; Dinneen E; Briggs T; Kelkar A; Rajan P; Nathan S; Kelly JD; Sooriakumaran P; Sridhar A J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1419-1426. PubMed ID: 35192106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is It Safe to Switch from a Standard Anterior to Retzius-Sparing Approach in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy? Lambert E; Allaeys C; Berquin C; De Visschere P; Verbeke S; Vanneste B; Fonteyne V; Van Praet C; Lumen N Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3447-3460. PubMed ID: 36975474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anterior vs. Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference? Albisinni S; Dasnoy C; Diamand R; Mjaess G; Aoun F; Esperto F; Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Roumeguere T; DE Nunzio C Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 74(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 34714037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis. Xu JN; Xu ZY; Yin HM Front Surg; 2021; 8():738421. PubMed ID: 34660680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]