BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35617274)

  • 1. Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chung DY; Jung HD; Kim DK; Lee MH; Lee SW; Paick S; Lee JY; Jeon SH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268182. PubMed ID: 35617274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA
    Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
    Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Phukan C; Mclean A; Nambiar A; Mukherjee A; Somani B; Krishnamoorthy R; Sridhar A; Rajan P; Sooriakumaran P; Rai BP
    World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1123-1134. PubMed ID: 31089802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Tahra A; Sen UT; Sobay R; İnkaya A; Kucuk EV; Boylu U
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Jun; 46(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 35221232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Retzius sparing on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Tai TE; Wu CC; Kang YN; Wu JC
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):4020-4029. PubMed ID: 31617093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching.
    Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A
    Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.
    Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retzius-Sparing
    Turkolmez K; Akpinar C; Kubilay E; Suer E
    J Endourol; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1214-1222. PubMed ID: 35546454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes.
    Checcucci E; Veccia A; Fiori C; Amparore D; Manfredi M; Di Dio M; Morra I; Galfano A; Autorino R; Bocciardi AM; Dasgupta P; Porpiglia F
    BJU Int; 2020 Jan; 125(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31373142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pelvic Anatomical Features After Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Intended for Early Recovery of Urinary Symptoms.
    Ota Y; Hamamoto S; Matsuyama N; Hamakawa T; Iwatsuki S; Etani T; Taguchi K; Naiki T; Ando R; Nakane A; Okada A; Kawai N; Kubota Y; Yasui T
    J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 32935558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kadhim H; Ang KM; Tan WS; Nathan A; Pavan N; Mazzon G; Al-Kadhi O; Di G; Dinneen E; Briggs T; Kelkar A; Rajan P; Nathan S; Kelly JD; Sooriakumaran P; Sridhar A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1419-1426. PubMed ID: 35192106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is It Safe to Switch from a Standard Anterior to Retzius-Sparing Approach in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?
    Lambert E; Allaeys C; Berquin C; De Visschere P; Verbeke S; Vanneste B; Fonteyne V; Van Praet C; Lumen N
    Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3447-3460. PubMed ID: 36975474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anterior vs. Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?
    Albisinni S; Dasnoy C; Diamand R; Mjaess G; Aoun F; Esperto F; Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Roumeguere T; DE Nunzio C
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 74(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 34714037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis.
    Xu JN; Xu ZY; Yin HM
    Front Surg; 2021; 8():738421. PubMed ID: 34660680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.