113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35618533)
1. Quantitative Indicators of Retraction Phenomenon on an Automated Breast Volume Scanner: Initial Study in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Prediction of Breast Tumors.
Yan L; Wen C; Lu Q; Jing L; Mao W; Shen X; Zheng F; Wang W; Ma Y; Huang B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1496-1508. PubMed ID: 35618533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner.
Zheng FY; Yan LX; Huang BJ; Xia HS; Wang X; Lu Q; Li CX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2123-9. PubMed ID: 26272029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic value of automated breast volume scanner in high-risk and small breast lesions].
Su KL; Xu HB; Zhang ZX; Pan N; He JL; Hu ZJ; Yang OO; Luo H; Yang HF; Liu LL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 35(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 24332060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiating axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer patients: A comparison of radiomic signatures from multiparametric breast MR sequences.
Chai R; Ma H; Xu M; Arefan D; Cui X; Liu Y; Zhang L; Wu S; Xu K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 50(4):1125-1132. PubMed ID: 30848041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Mammographic Texture Analysis in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors.
Li Z; Yu L; Wang X; Yu H; Gao Y; Ren Y; Wang G; Zhou X
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e621-e627. PubMed ID: 29199085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI.
Nie K; Chen JH; Yu HJ; Chu Y; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1513-25. PubMed ID: 19000868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Value of Quantitative Gray-Scale Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.
Lv Y; Chi X; Sun B; Lin S; Xing D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(3):405-412. PubMed ID: 32345804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative ultrasound image analysis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients.
Drukker K; Giger M; Meinel LA; Starkey A; Janardanan J; Abe H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Nov; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 23526445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Min Q; Shao K; Zhai L; Liu W; Zhu C; Yuan L; Yang J
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():32. PubMed ID: 25889380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion weighted imaging for the differentiation of breast tumors: From apparent diffusion coefficient to high order diffusion tensor imaging.
Teruel JR; Goa PE; Sjøbakk TE; Østlie A; Fjøsne HE; Bathen TF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):1111-21. PubMed ID: 26494124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiparametric radiomics methods for breast cancer tissue characterization using radiological imaging.
Parekh VS; Jacobs MA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Apr; 180(2):407-421. PubMed ID: 32020435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Kong WT; Zhou WJ; Wang Y; Zhuang XM; Wu M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2019 Oct; 46(4):459-466. PubMed ID: 31102067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-modal computer-assisted evaluation of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients on both real-time elastography and B-mode ultrasound.
Zhang Q; Suo J; Chang W; Shi J; Chen M
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():66-74. PubMed ID: 28987700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction model of axillary lymph node status using automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and ki-67 status in early-stage breast cancer.
Wang Q; Li B; Liu Z; Shang H; Jing H; Shao H; Chen K; Liang X; Cheng W
BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):929. PubMed ID: 36031602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of elastic heterogeneity using contourlet-based texture analysis in shear-wave elastography for breast tumor classification.
Zhang Q; Xiao Y; Chen S; Wang C; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):588-600. PubMed ID: 25444693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic performance of quantitative mapping in breast cancer patients: a preliminary study using synthetic MRI.
Meng T; He N; He H; Liu K; Ke L; Liu H; Zhong L; Huang C; Yang A; Zhou C; Qian L; Xie C
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Dec; 20(1):88. PubMed ID: 33317609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
