149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35618682)
1. The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant-supported metal copings: An in vitro study.
Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Davoudi A; Fathi A; Ziaei M; Berg E
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Aug; 8(4):1002-1007. PubMed ID: 35618682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of different methods of cleansing temporary cement (with and without eugenol) on the final bond strength of implant-supported zirconia copings after final cementation: An
Bajoghli F; Fathi A; Ebadian B; Jowkar M; Sabouhi M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():22. PubMed ID: 36960017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.
Song MY; An H; Park EJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e210-e215. PubMed ID: 28598530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of titanium copings to implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Chiam SY; Lee HL; Bedrossian AE; Xu Q; Kuykendall W; Ren A; Hess TA; Ramos V; Chung KH
J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):340-347. PubMed ID: 37203989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography.
El-Helbawy NG; El-Hatery AA; Ahmed MH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 27183064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention of luting agents used for implant-supported restorations: A comparative
Aladag A; Sahan MH; Akkus NO; Aktas R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1073-1078. PubMed ID: 32788484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention of cemented zirconia copings on TiBase abutments.
Santos-Neto OS; Gonçalves LM; Maia-Filho EM; Malheiros AS; Firoozmand LM; Villis PC; Cardenas AF; Tavarez RR
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Dec; 34(3):214-220. PubMed ID: 35088807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of mechanical and chemo-mechanical temporary cement cleaning methods on shear bond strength with self-adhesive resin cement (an in-vitro study).
Arafa AM; Aboalazm E; Kamel MH
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):648. PubMed ID: 36578003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of surface treatments to remove temporary cement remnants on the bond strength between the core composite and resin cement.
Altintas SH; Hamiyet K; Kilic S
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1441-1447. PubMed ID: 31607737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tensile strength of Ni-Cr copings subjected to inner surface sandblasting using different cementing agents: An in vitro study.
Peixoto RF; Hermanson MP; Pupim D; Rodrigues RC; Antunes RP; de Mattos Mda G
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 26028134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
