These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35618849)
1. Maximum Entropy Technique and Regularization Functional for Determining the Pharmacokinetic Parameters in DCE-MRI. Amini Farsani Z; Schmid VJ J Digit Imaging; 2022 Oct; 35(5):1176-1188. PubMed ID: 35618849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results. Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximum Entropy Approach in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Farsani ZA; Schmid VJ Methods Inf Med; 2017; 56(6):461-468. PubMed ID: 29582918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modified Maximum Entropy Method and Estimating the AIF via DCE-MRI Data Analysis. Amini Farsani Z; Schmid VJ Entropy (Basel); 2022 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 35205451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Greybox: A hybrid algorithm for direct estimation of tracer kinetic parameters from undersampled DCE-MRI data. Rastogi A; Yalavarthy PK Med Phys; 2024 Jul; 51(7):4838-4858. PubMed ID: 38214325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation. Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck. Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations. Schabel MC; Fluckiger JU; DiBella EV Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4783-806. PubMed ID: 20679691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters. Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer. Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blind deconvolution estimation of an arterial input function for small animal DCE-MRI. Jiřík R; Taxt T; Macíček O; Bartoš M; Kratochvíla J; Souček K; Dražanová E; Krátká L; Hampl A; Starčuk Z Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():46-56. PubMed ID: 31150814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA. Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Data with a Constrained Local AIF. Duan C; Kallehauge JF; Pérez-Torres CJ; Bretthorst GL; Beeman SC; Tanderup K; Ackerman JJH; Garbow JR Mol Imaging Biol; 2018 Feb; 20(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 28536804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI by fitting the signal in the complex plane. Simonis FF; Sbrizzi A; Beld E; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1236-45. PubMed ID: 26525012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling. Li X; Cai Y; Moloney B; Chen Y; Huang W; Woods M; Coakley FV; Rooney WD; Garzotto MG; Springer CS J Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 269():104-112. PubMed ID: 27288764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images based on Bayesian P-splines. Schmid VJ; Whitcher B; Padhani AR; Yang GZ IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Jun; 28(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 19272996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An extended vascular model for less biased estimation of permeability parameters in DCE-T1 images. Nejad-Davarani SP; Bagher-Ebadian H; Ewing JR; Noll DC; Mikkelsen T; Chopp M; Jiang Q NMR Biomed; 2017 Jun; 30(6):. PubMed ID: 28211961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration? Wake N; Chandarana H; Rusinek H; Fujimoto K; Moy L; Sodickson DK; Kim SG Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():16-23. PubMed ID: 29777820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. Mehrabian H; Chandrana C; Pang I; Chopra R; Martel AL Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1735-47. PubMed ID: 22752523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]