These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35619547)

  • 1. Poor inter-observer agreement in anatomical classifications of infrapopliteal arterial disease due to mandatory selection of only one target artery.
    Ludwigs K; Andersson M; Johnsson ÅA; Nordanstig J; Svalkvist A; Falkenberg M; Baubeta E
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1298-1306. PubMed ID: 35619547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography for the Assessment of Infrapopliteal Arterial Occlusive Lesions, Based on the TASC II Classification Criteria.
    Fridh EB; Ludwigs K; Svalkvist A; Andersson M; Nordanstig J; Falkenberg M; Johnsson ÅA
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Oct; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 33142848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Midterm Outcomes After Infrapopliteal Interventions in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Based on the TASC II Classification of Below-the-Knee Arteries.
    Singh GD; Brinza EK; Hildebrand J; Waldo SW; Foley TR; Laird JR; Armstrong EJ
    J Endovasc Ther; 2017 Jun; 24(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 28421855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revascularization by angioplasty of type D femoropopliteal and long infrapopliteal lesion in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia: are TASC II recommendations suitable? A population-based cohort study.
    Faglia E; Clerici G; Airoldi F; Tavano D; Caminiti M; Curci V; Mantero M; Morabito A; Edmonds M
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2012 Dec; 11(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 23089965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Grijalba FU; Esandi MC
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 20105092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the lower limb vasculature before free fibula flap transfer. A prospective blinded comparison between magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Klein S; Van Lienden KP; Van't Veer M; Smit JM; Werker PM
    Microsurgery; 2013 Oct; 33(7):539-44. PubMed ID: 24038374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Categorisation of tibial artery disease on computer tomography angiography according to the TASC II classification.
    Rehman A; Antonietti A; Burnside G; Torella F
    Vascular; 2017 Aug; 25(4):402-405. PubMed ID: 28121278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of high-resolution contrast-enhanced 3D MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of hepatic arterial anatomy.
    Matoba M; Tonami H; Kuginuki M; Yokota H; Takashima S; Yamamoto I
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Jun; 58(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 12788315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ECG-triggered non-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries in comparison to DSA in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease.
    Partovi S; Rasmus M; Schulte AC; Rengier F; Jacob AL; Aschwanden M; Karmonik C; Bongartz G; Bilecen D
    MAGMA; 2013 Jun; 26(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 23117342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of treatment plans for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease made with electrocardiography-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hoch JR; Kennell TW; Hollister MS; Sproat IA; Swan JS; Acher CW; Burks J; Heisey DM
    Am J Surg; 1999 Aug; 178(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 10487272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Varga-Szemes A; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ; Suranyi P; De Cecco CN; Muscogiuri G; Caruso D; Yamada RT; Litwin SE; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Giri S; Vliegenthart R; Todoran TM
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28109932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
    Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The diagnostic value of non-contrast enhanced quiescent interval single shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3T for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, in comparison to CT angiography.
    Wu G; Yang J; Zhang T; Morelli JN; Giri S; Li X; Tang W
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Oct; 18(1):71. PubMed ID: 27760564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TRICKS magnetic resonance angiography at 3-tesla for assessing whole lower extremity vascular tree in patients with high-grade critical limb ischemia: DSA and TASC II guidelines correlations.
    Ko SF; Sheu JJ; Lee CC; Huang CC; Lee FY; Ng SH; Lee YW; Yip HK; Chen MC
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():192150. PubMed ID: 23304080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla.
    Wei LM; Zhu YQ; Zhang PL; Lu HT; Zhao JG
    J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Feb; 26(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 30580695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in critical limb ischemia: performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and TSE-based subtraction techniques.
    Altaha MA; Jaskolka JD; Tan K; Rick M; Schmitt P; Menezes RJ; Wintersperger BJ
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1218-1226. PubMed ID: 27352087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of CT and MR angiography in evaluation of peripheral arterial disease before endovascular intervention.
    Cina A; Di Stasi C; Semeraro V; Marano R; Savino G; Iezzi R; Bonomo L
    Acta Radiol; 2016 May; 57(5):547-56. PubMed ID: 26185265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.