These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35620371)

  • 1. Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision.
    Altinbay D; Sahli E; Idil A
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2022; 34(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 35620371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast sensitivity measured by two different test methods in healthy, young adults with normal visual acuity.
    Koefoed VF; Baste V; Roumes C; Høvding G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 93(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 25056525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a New Test for Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function (Optopad-CSF) at Near Vision.
    de Fez D; García C; Luque-Cobija MJ; Mena-Guevara KJ; Daudén P; Piñero DP
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 39001266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in visually impaired individuals using K-CS test. A novel smartphone-based contrast sensitivity test-Design and validation.
    Karampatakis V; P Papadopoulou E; Almpanidou S; Karamitopoulos L; Almaliotis D
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0288512. PubMed ID: 38330096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis.
    Townley D; Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20070279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vision-related quality of life and visual function after retinal detachment surgery.
    Okamoto F; Okamoto Y; Hiraoka T; Oshika T
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jul; 146(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 18400201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Three Different Contrast Sensitivity Tests in Adults and in Children with and without Amblyopia.
    Ulrich K; Palmowski-Wolfe A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2019 Apr; 236(4):434-437. PubMed ID: 30999326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two methods for measuring contrast sensitivity in anisometropic amblyopia.
    Mohammadi A; Hashemi H; Mirzajani A; Yekta A; Jafarzadehpur E; Khabazkhoob M
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 30(4):343-347. PubMed ID: 30555968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a Home-Printable Vision Screening Test for Telemedicine.
    Crossland MD; Dekker TM; Hancox J; Lisi M; Wemyss TA; Thomas PBM
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 139(3):271-277. PubMed ID: 33410910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast sensitivity among patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy.
    Kappel PJ; Monnet D; Yu F; Brezin AP; Levinson RD; Holland GN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Feb; 147(2):351-356.e2. PubMed ID: 18973873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional Evaluation of the Visual Pathway in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Using a Multifunction Stimulator Monitor.
    Satue M; Jarauta L; Obis J; Cipres M; Rodrigo MJ; Almarcegui C; Dolz I; Ara JR; Martin J; Pablo LE; Garcia-Martin E
    J Ophthalmol; 2019; 2019():2890193. PubMed ID: 31641531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children.
    Anderson HA; Mathew AR; Cheng H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Jan; 43(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 36164764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity and Stability of Functional Vision Tests in Detecting Subtle Changes Under Multiple Simulated Conditions.
    Chen Z; Zhuang Y; Xu Z; Chan LYL; Zhang S; Ye Q; Feng L; Lu ZL; Li J
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 10(7):7. PubMed ID: 34100925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast Sensitivity and Stereoacuity in Successfully Treated Refractive Amblyopia.
    Jia Y; Ye Q; Zhang S; Feng L; Liu J; Xu Z; Zhuang Y; He Y; Zhou Y; Chen X; Yao Y; Jiang R; Thompson B; Li J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2022 Jan; 63(1):6. PubMed ID: 34989762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation.
    Carballo-Alvarez J; Vazquez-Molini JM; Sanz-Fernandez JC; Garcia-Bella J; Polo V; García-Feijoo J; Martinez-de-la-Casa JM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25884715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the VCTS-6500 and the CSV-1000 tests for visual contrast sensitivity testing.
    Franco S; Silva AC; Carvalho AS; Macedo AS; Lira M
    Neurotoxicology; 2010 Dec; 31(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 20600292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Visual Field Measurements in Glaucomatous Eyes using Oculus and Metrovision Perimeters.
    Daneshvar R; Ehsaei A; Moghadas Sharif N; Pato Z
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2023; 35(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 37680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age norms for grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in children using eye tracking technology.
    Esteban-Ibañez E; Pérez-Roche T; Prieto E; Castillo O; Fanlo-Zarazaga A; Alejandre A; Gutierrez D; Ortin M; Pueyo V
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 42(3):747-756. PubMed ID: 34622374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults.
    Rijal S; Cheng H; Marsack JD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Sep; 41(5):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 34418124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of the CSV-1000 in adults and children.
    Kelly SA; Pang Y; Klemencic S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 89(8):1172-81. PubMed ID: 22797510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.