148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35620374)
21. Comparison of two different ultrasound methods of phacoemulsification.
Helvacioglu F; Yeter C; Sencan S; Tunc Z; Uyar OM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 158(2):221-226.e1. PubMed ID: 24792106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Computer-assisted phacoemulsification for hard cataracts].
Zemba M; Papadatu AC; Sîrbu LN; Avram C
Oftalmologia; 2012; 56(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 23755523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of a torsional and a standard tip with a monitored forced infusion phacoemulsification system.
Boulter T; Jensen JD; Christensen MD; Lambert NG; Zaugg B; Stagg BC; Pettey JH; Olson RJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Apr; 42(4):613-7. PubMed ID: 27113886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) in Three Phaco-Fragmentation Techniques for Dense Cataract Removal.
Fernández-Muñoz E; Chávez-Romero Y; Rivero-Gómez R; Aridjis R; Gonzalez-Salinas R
Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():2405-2412. PubMed ID: 37605764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ozil® versus conventional ultrasound phacoemulsification: a randomized comparative study.
Maalej A; Khallouli A; Wathek C; Rannen R
Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 35(4):565-8. PubMed ID: 25155201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds.
Berdahl JP; Jun B; DeStafeno JJ; Kim T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2091-5. PubMed ID: 19027565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of longitudinal and torsional ultrasound on corneal endothelial cells: experimental study in rabbit eyes.
Ungricht EL; Culp C; Qu P; Jensen N; Harris JT; Brintz BJ; Mamalis N; Olson RJ; Werner L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Mar; 48(3):349-354. PubMed ID: 34224479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Torsional ultrasound mode versus combined torsional and conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification for eyes with hard cataract.
Fakhry MA; El Shazly MI
Clin Ophthalmol; 2011; 5():973-8. PubMed ID: 21792288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
Gigliola S; Sborgia G; Niro A; Palmisano C; Puzo P; Giuliani G; Sborgia L; Sisto D; Pastore V; Furino C; Donghia R; Sborgia A; Boscia F; Alessio G
Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(12):1868-1875. PubMed ID: 34926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility of the New Torsional Phacoemulsification Software Phacoemulsification (Ozil IP) in Hard Cataracts.
Kotb AM; Elawamry AI
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2013; 2(6):372-4. PubMed ID: 26107149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Efficiency of a polymer-coated phacoemulsification tip in cataract surgery.
Cardenas IA; Ungricht EL; Zaugg B; Olson RJ; Pettey JH
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1056-1060. PubMed ID: 37057705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative clinical study of Whitestar Signature phacoemulsification system with standard and Ellips FX handpieces.
Tognetto D; D'Aloisio R; Cecchini P; Di Nicola M; Di Martino G
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1697-1702. PubMed ID: 28707255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of bimanual and micro-coaxial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound.
Wang Y; Xia Y; Liu X; Zheng D; Luo L; Liu Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 20163365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Determining optimal torsional ultrasound power for cataract surgery with automatic longitudinal pulses at maximum vacuum ex vivo.
Ronquillo CC; Zaugg B; Stagg B; Kirk KR; Gupta I; Barlow WR; Pettey JH; Olson RJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 158(6):1262-1266.e2. PubMed ID: 25174892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. OUR EXPERIENCE WITH ACTIVE SENTRY AND CENTURION OZIL HANDPIECES.
Jirásková N; Stepanov A
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2021; 77(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 33740863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of conventional and torsional mode (OZil) phacoemulsification: randomized prospective clinical study.
Bozkurt E; Bayraktar S; Yazgan S; Cakir M; Cekic O; Erdogan H; Yilmaz OF
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):984-9. PubMed ID: 19882578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of torsional and longitudinal modes using phacoemulsification parameters.
Rekas M; Montés-Micó R; Krix-Jachym K; Kluś A; Stankiewicz A; Ferrer-Blasco T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1719-24. PubMed ID: 19781466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Wound and surface temperatures in vivo in torsional and longitudinal modalities of ultrasound in coaxial microincisional cataract surgery.
Nair S; Nair RU
Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():249-255. PubMed ID: 28184151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction.
Zeng M; Liu X; Liu Y; Xia Y; Luo L; Yuan Z; Zeng Y; Liu Y
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 92(8):1092-6. PubMed ID: 18567650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
