These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35620977)

  • 1. The effect of an occlusion-induced delay on braking behavior in critical situations: A driving simulator study.
    de Winter JCF; Saffarian M; Senders JW
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1336-1344. PubMed ID: 35620977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.
    Li S; Li P; Yao Y; Han X; Xu Y; Chen L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31986072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using perceptual cues for brake response to a lead vehicle: Comparing threshold and accumulator models of visual looming.
    Xue Q; Markkula G; Yan X; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():114-124. PubMed ID: 29929099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling braking behaviour and accident probability of drivers under increasing time pressure conditions.
    Pawar NM; Khanuja RK; Choudhary P; Velaga NR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 136():105401. PubMed ID: 31884236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trusting Other Vehicles' Automatic Emergency Braking Decreases Self-Protective Driving.
    Kinosada Y; Kobayashi T; Shinohara K
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):880-895. PubMed ID: 32101470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling driver's braking and steering behavior along horizontal curves of two-lane rural highways for ADAS applications.
    Choudhari T; Maji A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(7):404-409. PubMed ID: 35862932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. I want to brake free: The effect of connected vehicle features on driver behaviour, usability and acceptance.
    Payre W; Diels C
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102932. PubMed ID: 31445460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
    Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of alcohol use on accelerating and braking behaviors of drivers.
    Yadav AK; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):353-358. PubMed ID: 31039040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?
    Roche F; Thüring M; Trukenbrod AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105588. PubMed ID: 32531374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brake response time between male drivers with and without paraplegia: Association between sociodemographic, motor and neurological characteristics.
    Santos S; Brech GC; Alonso AC; Greve JMD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):207-211. PubMed ID: 33661082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benefits estimation of regenerative braking versus service braking.
    Mitropoulos-Rundus C; Schwarz C; McGehee D
    Ergonomics; 2021 Sep; 64(9):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 33781173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting driver reaction time and deceleration: Comparison of perception-reaction thresholds and evidence accumulation framework.
    Durrani U; Lee C; Shah D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105889. PubMed ID: 33248429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a sudden brake warning system: effect on the response time of the following driver.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 20034608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.