These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Cost-Effectiveness of 90-day Single-use Flexible Cystoscope Trial: Single Center Micro-Costing Analysis and User Satisfaction. Assmus MA; Krambeck AE; Lee MS; Agarwal DK; Mellon M; Rivera ME; Large T Urology; 2022 Sep; 167():61-66. PubMed ID: 35772484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time Efficiency and Performance of Single-Use Chen R; Baas C; Farkouh A; Shete K; Peverini DR; Hartman JC; Amasyali AS; Belle J; Baldwin EA; Baldwin DD J Endourol; 2024 Jan; 38(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 37800857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures. Baboudjian M; Pradere B; Martin N; Gondran-Tellier B; Angerri O; Boucheron T; Bastide C; Emiliani E; Misrai V; Breda A; Lechevallier E Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):681-687. PubMed ID: 36543725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes. Hogan D; Rauf H; Kinnear N; Hennessey DB J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1460-1464. PubMed ID: 35607858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope: A Multi-Institutional International Study. Scotland K; Wong VKF; Chan JYH; Tawfiek E; Chiura A; Chew BH; Bagley D J Endourol; 2020 Sep; 34(9):981-986. PubMed ID: 32578453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Institutional Micro-Cost Comparative Analysis of Reusable vs Single-use Cystoscopes With Assessment of Environmental Footprint. Bertolo R; Gilioli V; Veccia A; Malandra S; Dal Corso L; Fenzi D; Mazzetto F; Antonelli A Urology; 2024 Jun; 188():70-76. PubMed ID: 38499187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conversion to Disposable Cystoscopes Decreased Post-procedure Encounters and Infections Compared to Reusable Cystoscopes. Geldmaker LE; Baird BA; Lyon TD; Regele EJ; Wajswol EJ; Pathak RA; Petrou SP; Haehn DA; Gajarawala NM; Ball CT; Broderick GA; Thiel DD Urol Pract; 2023 Jul; 10(4):312-317. PubMed ID: 37228224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs. Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective Randomized Trial of Single-Use Johnson BA; Raman JD; Best SL; Lotan Y J Endourol; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 37565290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Utility of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope Compared with a Standard Reusable Device: A Randomized Noninferiority Study. Holmes A; O'Kane D; Wombwell A; Grills R J Endourol; 2023 Jan; 37(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 36128833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope is comparable to the reusable, flexible cystoscope for the detection of bladder cancer. Seyam RM; Zeitouni OM; Alsibai TM; AlAyoub AJ; Al-Qassab OM; AlDeiry MA; Zino AO; Hulwi HS; Mokhtar AA; Shahbaz M; Junejo NN; Alotaibi MF; Alzahrani HM; Alothman KI; Alkhateeb SS; Al-Hussain TO; Altaweel WM Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13495. PubMed ID: 32778771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]