171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35624328)
1. Adoption of Optimal Small (6-9 mm) Colorectal Polyp Resection Technique Over Time.
Muething L; Quach B; Smith DE; Gao D; Smith JA; Simril RT; Tompkins A; Espinoza J; Cowan ML; Hammad H; Wani S; Patel SG
Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Jan; 68(1):240-251. PubMed ID: 35624328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pedunculated colorectal polyps with heads ≤ 1 cm in diameter can be resected using cold snare polypectomy.
Kudo T; Horiuchi A; Horiuchi I; Kajiyama M; Morita A; Tanaka N
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2021; 84(3):411-415. PubMed ID: 34599564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Lv YC; Yao YH; Lei JJ; Tang T
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Dec; 42(6):757-765. PubMed ID: 37776439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps.
Desai S; Gupta S; Copur-Dahi N; Krinsky ML
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1206-1213. PubMed ID: 31183796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Cold Snare and Forceps Polypectomy Among Small POLYPs in Rates of Complete Resection: The TINYPOLYP Trial.
Wei MT; Louie CY; Chen Y; Pan JY; Quan SY; Wong R; Brown R; Clark M; Jensen K; Lau H; Friedland S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 117(8):1305-1310. PubMed ID: 35467557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps.
Park SK; Ko BM; Han JP; Hong SJ; Lee MS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):527-32.e1. PubMed ID: 26358331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial.
Pedersen IB; Rawa-Golebiewska A; Calderwood AH; Brix LD; Grode LB; Botteri E; Bugajski M; Kaminski MF; Januszewicz W; Ødegaard H; Kleist B; Kalager M; Løberg M; Bretthauer M; Hoff G; Medhus A; Holme Ø
Endoscopy; 2022 Oct; 54(10):961-969. PubMed ID: 35008112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cold polypectomy techniques for small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Abuelazm M; Awad AK; Mohamed I; Mahmoud A; Shaikhkhalil H; Shaheen N; Abdelwahab O; Afifi AM; Abdelazeem B; Othman MO
Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Oct; 39(10):1329-1339. PubMed ID: 37735986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Liu W; Gong J; Gu L
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 May; 38(1):136. PubMed ID: 37204495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.
Lee CK; Shim JJ; Jang JY
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 108(10):1593-600. PubMed ID: 24042189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative efficacy of cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Jung YS; Park CH; Nam E; Eun CS; Park DI; Han DS
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1149-1159. PubMed ID: 28812188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.
Komeda Y; Kashida H; Sakurai T; Tribonias G; Okamoto K; Kono M; Yamada M; Adachi T; Mine H; Nagai T; Asakuma Y; Hagiwara S; Matsui S; Watanabe T; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Chiba Y; Kudo M
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan; 23(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 28127206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shinozaki S; Kobayashi Y; Hayashi Y; Sakamoto H; Lefor AK; Yamamoto H
Dig Endosc; 2018 Sep; 30(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 29675857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polypectomy practices of sub-centimeter polyps in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
Din S; Ball AJ; Taylor E; Rutter M; Riley SA; Johal S
Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3224-30. PubMed ID: 25591413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Appropriate and Tailored Polypectomy: Expert Review.
Copland AP; Kahi CJ; Ko CW; Ginsberg GG
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Mar; 22(3):470-479.e5. PubMed ID: 38032585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resection rates and safety profile of cold vs. hot snare polypectomy in polyps sized 5-10 mm and 11-20 mm.
Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Apr; 51(4):536-541. PubMed ID: 30853272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An international polypectomy practice survey.
Willems P; Orkut S; Ditisheim S; Pohl H; Barkun A; Djinbachian R; Bouin M; von Renteln D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 32267187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancy between self-reported and actual colonoscopy polypectomy practices for the removal of small polyps.
Kadle N; Westerveld DR; Banerjee D; Jacobs C; Gesiotto F; Moon N; Forde JJ; Conti M; Hatamleh D; Taylor R; Brar T; Riverso M; Jawaid S; Perbtani YB; Zhang Y; Draganov PV; Beyth R; Yang D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Mar; 91(3):655-662.e2. PubMed ID: 31669181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study).
Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Asai S; Yokota I; Akamine E; Kato M; Akamatsu T; Tada K; Komeda Y; Iwatate M; Kawakami K; Nishikawa M; Watanabe D; Yamauchi A; Fukata N; Shimatani M; Ooi M; Fujita K; Sano Y; Kashida H; Hirose S; Iwagami H; Uedo N; Teramukai S; Tanaka K
Gut; 2018 Nov; 67(11):1950-1957. PubMed ID: 28970290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
