166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35625972)
1. Radiological Underestimation of Tumor Size as a Relevant Risk Factor for Positive Margin Rate in Breast-Conserving Therapy of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).
Schultek G; Gerber B; Reimer T; Stubert J; Hartmann S; Martin A; Stachs A
Cancers (Basel); 2022 May; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 35625972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of specimen radiography in breast-conserving therapy of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lange M; Reimer T; Hartmann S; Glass Ä; Stachs A
Breast; 2016 Apr; 26():73-9. PubMed ID: 27017245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Underestimation of Microcalcifications Only by Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: A New Predictor of Specimens without Microcalcifications.
Cheung YC; Chen SC; Ueng SH; Yu CC
J Clin Med; 2020 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32957459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Dillon MF; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; Hill AD; O'Higgins N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 17443388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic extent of microcalcifications and oestrogen receptor expression affect preoperative breast carcinoma in situ size estimation.
Vernet-Tomas M; Mojal S; Gamero R; Nicolau P; Rodríguez-Arana A; Plancarte F; Corominas JM; Serrano-Munne L; Carreras R; Sabadell D
Breast Cancer; 2017 May; 24(3):466-472. PubMed ID: 27639877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-Enhanced Mammographic Features of In Situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Manifesting Microcalcifications Only: Help to Predict Underestimation?
Cheung YC; Chen K; Yu CC; Ueng SH; Li CW; Chen SC
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 34503181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience.
Sahoo S; Recant WM; Jaskowiak N; Tong L; Heimann R
Breast J; 2005; 11(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15982389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ found on stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications without mass: radiological-histological correlation.
Szynglarewicz B; Kasprzak P; Biecek P; Halon A; Matkowski R
Radiol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 50(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 27247546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is There Any Association Between Mammographic Features of Microcalcifications and Breast Cancer Subtypes in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?
Avdan Aslan A; Gültekin S; Esendağli Yilmaz G; Kurukahvecioğlu O
Acad Radiol; 2021 Jul; 28(7):963-968. PubMed ID: 32620528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does a Close Surgical Margin for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Associated with Invasive Breast Carcinoma Affect Breast Cancer Recurrence?
Kuru B; Yuruker S; Sullu Y; Gursel B; Ozen N
J Invest Surg; 2020 Aug; 33(7):627-633. PubMed ID: 32643476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What should be the width of radiological margin to optimize resection of non-palpable invasive or in situ ductal carcinoma?
Ouldamer L; Lechaux E; Arbion F; Body G; Vildé A
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):889-93. PubMed ID: 25456102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ductal carcinoma in situ detected in the mammographic era: an analysis of clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors affecting outcome with breast-conserving therapy.
Vicini FA; Lacerna MD; Goldstein NS; Horwitz EM; Dmuchowski CF; White JR; Gustafson GS; Ingold JA; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Oct; 39(3):627-35. PubMed ID: 9336142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Suh YJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Koo HR; Yoon JH
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e349-56. PubMed ID: 22422382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors associated with local recurrence of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ in patients given breast-conserving therapy.
Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Lacerna MD; Balasubramaniam M; Martinez AA; Rebner M; Pettinga J; Frazier RC; Vicini FA
Cancer; 2000 Feb; 88(3):596-607. PubMed ID: 10649253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tremelling A; Aft RL; Cyr AE; Gillanders WE; Glover-Collins K; Herrmann V; Margenthaler JA
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1502. PubMed ID: 34245135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reoperation rate of ductal carcinoma in situ: impact of tomosynthesis (3D) and spot magnification.
Arlan K; Meretoja TJ; Hukkinen K
Acta Radiol; 2023 Feb; 64(2):479-488. PubMed ID: 35317642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic pattern of microcalcifications in the preoperative diagnosis of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathologic correlation.
Hermann G; Keller RJ; Drossman S; Caravella BA; Tartter P; Panetta RA; Bleiweiss IJ
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Aug; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 10459309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Margin width and local recurrence after breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Ekatah GE; Turnbull AK; Arthur LM; Thomas J; Dodds C; Dixon JM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2029-2035. PubMed ID: 28917445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study.
Benitez PR; Streeter O; Vicini F; Mehta V; Quiet C; Kuske R; Hayes MK; Arthur D; Kuerer H; Freedman G; Keisch M; Dipetrillo T; Khan D; Hudes R
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 16978943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
