152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35626106)
1. Characterization of Poorly Cohesive and Signet Ring Cell Carcinomas and Identification of PTPRM as a Diagnostic Marker.
Bae GE; Kang SH; Kim JS; Kim SH; Kim KH; Kim JM; Suh KS; Park HK; Kang DW; Lee H; Yeo MK
Cancers (Basel); 2022 May; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 35626106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consensus on the pathological definition and classification of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma.
Mariette C; Carneiro F; Grabsch HI; van der Post RS; Allum W; de Manzoni G;
Gastric Cancer; 2019 Jan; 22(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30167905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Signet ring cell percentage in poorly cohesive gastric cancer patients: A potential novel predictor of survival.
Roviello F; Marano L; Ambrosio MR; Resca L; D'Ignazio A; Petrelli F; Petrioli R; Costantini M; Polom K; Macchiarelli R; Biviano I; Marrelli D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):561-569. PubMed ID: 34511269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Gene Expression Profiles of Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma and Poorly Cohesive Carcinoma in Early Gastric Cancer.
Yeo MK; Kang SH; Jeong KB; Lee HS; Jeon HJ; Eun HS; Lee ES; Moon HS; Kim SH; Sung JK; Lee BS; Jeong HY
Clin Med Insights Oncol; 2022; 16():11795549221097941. PubMed ID: 35603092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mucin expression in gastric- and gastro-oesophageal signet-ring cell cancer: results from a comprehensive literature review and a large cohort study of Caucasian and Asian gastric cancer.
Kerckhoffs KGP; Liu DHW; Saragoni L; van der Post RS; Langer R; Bencivenga M; Iglesias M; Gallo G; Hewitt LC; Fazzi GE; Vos AM; Renaud F; Yoshikawa T; Oshima T; Tomezzoli A; de Manzoni G; Arai T; Kushima R; Carneiro F; Grabsch HI
Gastric Cancer; 2020 Sep; 23(5):765-779. PubMed ID: 32488651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of mucin expression profiles in breast carcinoma with signet ring cells: a clinicopathological study.
Ohashi R; Hayama A; Yanagihara K; Yamashita K; Sakatani T; Takei H; Naito Z
Diagn Pathol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):131. PubMed ID: 27846863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histologic purity of signet ring cell carcinoma is a favorable risk factor for lymph node metastasis in poorly cohesive, submucosa-invasive early gastric carcinoma.
Kim YH; Park JH; Park CK; Kim JH; Lee SK; Lee YC; Noh SH; Kim H
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Jul; 20(4):583-590. PubMed ID: 27663439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The amount of signet ring cells is significantly associated with tumour stage and survival in gastric poorly cohesive tumours.
Bencivenga M; Treppiedi E; Dal Cero M; Torroni L; Verlato G; Iglesias M; Renaud F; Tomezzoli A; Castelli C; Piessen G; Pera M; de Manzoni G
J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 121(7):1084-1089. PubMed ID: 32153051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphological features and mucin expression profile of breast carcinomas with signet-ring cell differentiation.
Bartosch C; Mendes N; Rios E; Rodrigues M; Eloy C; Reis CA; Amendoeira I
Pathol Res Pract; 2015 Aug; 211(8):588-95. PubMed ID: 26092598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Percentage of Signet Ring Cells Is Inversely Related to Aggressive Behavior and Poor Prognosis in Mixed-Type Gastric Cancer.
Marano L; Ambrosio MR; Resca L; Carbone L; Carpineto Samorani O; Petrioli R; Savelli V; Costantini M; Malaspina L; Polom K; Biviano I; Marrelli D; Roviello F
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():897218. PubMed ID: 35719955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GATA-3 immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder.
Ellis CL; Chang AG; Cimino-Mathews A; Argani P; Youssef RF; Kapur P; Montgomery EA; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Nov; 37(11):1756-60. PubMed ID: 24061521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Prognostic Significance and Gene Expression Characteristics of Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Study Based on the SEER and TCGA Databases.
Ma J; Meng Y; Zhou X; Guo L; Fu W
Front Surg; 2022; 9():819018. PubMed ID: 35372476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma: a correlative study of mutational signatures and prognostic significance based on histopathological subtypes.
Kwon CH; Kim YK; Lee S; Kim A; Park HJ; Choi Y; Won YJ; Park DY; Lauwers GY
Histopathology; 2018 Mar; 72(4):556-568. PubMed ID: 28873240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphologic heterogeneity of carcinoma with signet ring cell features at different primary sites.
Dahoud W; Gullo I; Imam R; Tang LH
Pathobiology; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38142679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intratumor stromal proportion predicts aggressive phenotype of gastric signet ring cell carcinomas.
Lee D; Ham IH; Son SY; Han SU; Kim YB; Hur H
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Jul; 20(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 27858181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the recent WHO histological classification for gastric cancer helpful for application to endoscopic resection?
Kim YH; Kim JH; Kim H; Kim H; Lee YC; Lee SK; Shin SK; Park JC; Chung HS; Park JJ; Youn YH; Park H; Noh SH; Choi SH
Gastric Cancer; 2016 Jul; 19(3):869-75. PubMed ID: 26324820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Value of Signet Ring Cells in Gastric Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.
Nie RC; Yuan SQ; Li YF; Chen YM; Chen XJ; Zhu BY; Xu LP; Zhou ZW; Chen S; Chen YB
J Cancer; 2017; 8(17):3396-3404. PubMed ID: 29151922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of poorly cohesive cell subtype of gastric cancer.
Nakamura K; Eto K; Iwagami S; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Ishimoto T; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Yoshida N; Baba H
Int J Clin Oncol; 2022 Mar; 27(3):512-519. PubMed ID: 35084597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Signet ring cells in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas have a more aggressive biological behavior.
Nafteux PR; Lerut TE; Villeneuve PJ; Dhaenens JM; De Hertogh G; Moons J; Coosemans WJ; Van Veer HG; De Leyn PR
Ann Surg; 2014 Dec; 260(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 24836142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A potential pitfall in evaluating HER2 immunohistochemistry for gastric signet ring cell carcinomas.
Woo CG; Ho WJ; Park YS; Park SR; Ryu MH; Jung HY; Kang YK
Pathology; 2017 Jan; 49(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 27931719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
